Threat level definition
Search:
Home
Bugtraq
Vulnerabilities
Mailing Lists
Jobs
Tools
Beta Programs
News
Infocus
Foundations
Microsoft
Unix
IDS
Incidents
Virus
Pen-Test
Firewalls
Columnists
Mailing Lists
Newsletters
Bugtraq
Focus on IDS
Focus on Linux
Focus on Microsoft
Forensics
Pen-test
Security Basics
Vuln Dev
Vulnerabilities
Jobs
Job Opportunities
Resumes
Job Seekers
Employers
Tools
RSS
News
Vulns
Security Research
BugTraq
Back to list
|
Post reply
clamav 0.65 remote DOS exploit
Feb 09 2004 02:24PM
Oliver Eikemeier (eikemeier fillmore-labs com)
(1 replies)
Re: clamav 0.65 remote DOS exploit
Feb 09 2004 02:52PM
Nigel Horne (njh bandsman co uk)
(1 replies)
Re: clamav 0.65 remote DOS exploit
Feb 09 2004 03:10PM
Oliver Eikemeier (eikemeier fillmore-labs com)
(2 replies)
Nigel Horne wrote:
> I tried reproducing the problem with the latest source in CVS, but had no problems.
> 0.65 is rather old, please try again with the latest version.
0.65 ist the latest stable (release) version, so I guess most production servers would
run it, instead of an CVS snapshot.
-Oliver
[ reply ]
Re: clamav 0.65 remote DOS exploit
Feb 09 2004 10:13PM
Mark Renouf (mark tweakt net)
(1 replies)
Re: clamav 0.65 remote DOS exploit
Feb 10 2004 09:41AM
Dennis Freise (cat final-frontier ath cx)
Re: clamav 0.65 remote DOS exploit
Feb 09 2004 08:04PM
Stefan Triller (stefantriller web de)
(1 replies)
Re: clamav 0.65 remote DOS exploit
Feb 10 2004 10:00AM
Oliver Eikemeier (eikemeier fillmore-labs com)
Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus
> I tried reproducing the problem with the latest source in CVS, but had no problems.
> 0.65 is rather old, please try again with the latest version.
0.65 ist the latest stable (release) version, so I guess most production servers would
run it, instead of an CVS snapshot.
-Oliver
[ reply ]