BugTraq
0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 20 2007 01:21PM
pdp (architect) (pdp gnucitizen googlemail com) (3 replies)
Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 21 2007 07:53PM
Thierry Zoller (Thierry Zoller lu) (2 replies)
Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 21 2007 09:21PM
Aaron Collins (collinsa ehawaii gov)
Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 21 2007 09:21PM
Kevin Finisterre (lists) (kf_lists digitalmunition com)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 20 2007 04:55PM
Aditya K Sood (zeroknock secniche org)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 20 2007 03:29PM
Gadi Evron (ge linuxbox org) (1 replies)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 20 2007 11:16PM
Crispin Cowan (crispin novell com) (2 replies)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 23 2007 05:34AM
Crispin Cowan (crispin novell com) (2 replies)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 25 2007 04:15PM
Iggy E (iggy_e yahoo com)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 23 2007 11:52PM
Chad Perrin (perrin apotheon com) (2 replies)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 24 2007 10:57PM
Lamont Granquist (lamont scriptkiddie org) (1 replies)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 25 2007 05:57PM
Roland Kuhn (rkuhn e18 physik tu-muenchen de) (1 replies)
On 25 Sep 2007, at 00:57, Lamont Granquist wrote:

> The exploit is not made public by its use. The exploit is not even
> made public by (back-channel) sharing amongst the hacker/cracker
> community. The exploit is only made public if detected or the
> vulnerability is disclosed. Until detected/disclosed the hacker/
> cracker can use their 31337 0day spl01tz to break into whichever
> vulnerable machines they like. 0day exploits are valuable because
> the opposition is ignorant of them.
>
> Posting exploits to BUGTRAQ, however, inherently makes them not
> 0day...

And my ignorant self thought until this thread that the "0" in the
term referred to the number of days of head start granted to the
vendor. Silly me. Because that would make all vulnerabilities
published without prior warning to the vendor a "0day"...

Roland (who seems to remember that this was once the meaning of this
term)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFG+UwvI4MWO8QIRP0RAnIDAJ9/vdM7MKsf4nSaWRFkU5CKjF0QZACcDwRp
AqhjKJOfM+5Rcf1GfJxy93s=
=9DaC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ reply ]
RE: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 25 2007 06:39PM
Thor (Hammer of God) (thor hammerofgod com) (2 replies)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 25 2007 09:03PM
Steve Shockley (steve shockley shockley net)
defining 0day Sep 25 2007 07:02PM
Gadi Evron (ge linuxbox org) (3 replies)
RE: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 09:20PM
David Gillett (gillettdavid fhda edu)
Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 08:40PM
Charles Miller (cmiller pastiche org) (2 replies)
Re: defining 0day Sep 26 2007 11:25PM
Zow Terry Brugger (zow llnl gov) (1 replies)
Re: defining 0day Sep 26 2007 11:10PM
Chad Perrin (perrin apotheon com) (1 replies)
RE: defining 0day Sep 28 2007 12:20AM
Marvin Simkin (Marvin Simkin asu edu) (1 replies)
Re: defining 0day Sep 27 2007 06:34PM
Chad Perrin (perrin apotheon com)
Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 08:57PM
Gadi Evron (ge linuxbox org)
Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 07:51PM
Brian Loe (knobdy gmail com) (1 replies)
Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 07:59PM
Gadi Evron (ge linuxbox org) (1 replies)
Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 08:15PM
Brian Loe (knobdy gmail com) (1 replies)
Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 08:37PM
Adrian Griffis (adriang63 gmail com) (2 replies)
Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 09:05PM
Andrew Weaver (aweaver ee net)
Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 08:54PM
Brian Loe (knobdy gmail com)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 24 2007 09:59PM
Crispin Cowan (crispin novell com) (1 replies)
Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 25 2007 01:39PM
J. Oquendo (sil infiltrated net)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 21 2007 06:34PM
Casper Dik Sun COM (1 replies)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 21 2007 07:24PM
J. Oquendo (sil infiltrated net)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus