BugTraq
0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 20 2007 01:21PM
pdp (architect) (pdp gnucitizen googlemail com) (3 replies)
Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 21 2007 07:53PM
Thierry Zoller (Thierry Zoller lu) (2 replies)
Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 21 2007 09:21PM
Aaron Collins (collinsa ehawaii gov)
Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 21 2007 09:21PM
Kevin Finisterre (lists) (kf_lists digitalmunition com)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 20 2007 04:55PM
Aditya K Sood (zeroknock secniche org)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 20 2007 03:29PM
Gadi Evron (ge linuxbox org) (1 replies)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 20 2007 11:16PM
Crispin Cowan (crispin novell com) (2 replies)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 23 2007 05:34AM
Crispin Cowan (crispin novell com) (2 replies)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 25 2007 04:15PM
Iggy E (iggy_e yahoo com)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 23 2007 11:52PM
Chad Perrin (perrin apotheon com) (2 replies)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 24 2007 10:57PM
Lamont Granquist (lamont scriptkiddie org) (1 replies)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 25 2007 05:57PM
Roland Kuhn (rkuhn e18 physik tu-muenchen de) (1 replies)
RE: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 25 2007 06:39PM
Thor (Hammer of God) (thor hammerofgod com) (2 replies)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 25 2007 09:03PM
Steve Shockley (steve shockley shockley net)
defining 0day Sep 25 2007 07:02PM
Gadi Evron (ge linuxbox org) (3 replies)
RE: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 09:20PM
David Gillett (gillettdavid fhda edu)
Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 08:40PM
Charles Miller (cmiller pastiche org) (2 replies)
Re: defining 0day Sep 26 2007 11:25PM
Zow Terry Brugger (zow llnl gov) (1 replies)
Re: defining 0day Sep 26 2007 11:10PM
Chad Perrin (perrin apotheon com) (1 replies)
RE: defining 0day Sep 28 2007 12:20AM
Marvin Simkin (Marvin Simkin asu edu) (1 replies)
Re: defining 0day Sep 27 2007 06:34PM
Chad Perrin (perrin apotheon com)
Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 08:57PM
Gadi Evron (ge linuxbox org)
Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 07:51PM
Brian Loe (knobdy gmail com) (1 replies)
Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 07:59PM
Gadi Evron (ge linuxbox org) (1 replies)
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Brian Loe wrote:
> On 9/25/07, Gadi Evron <ge (at) linuxbox (dot) org [email concealed]> wrote:
>
>> Okay. I think we exhausted the different views, and maybe we are now able
>> to come to a conlusion on what we WANT 0day to mean.
>>
>> What do you, as professional, believe 0day should mean, regardless of
>> previous definitions?
>
>
> Seems to me that definitions, and language itself, is a product of
> evolution. You can't just remove all previous meanings. Its better
> anyway to stick to the most accepted, acknowledged and DOCUMENTED
> definitions:

No longer good enough.

We can get a press scare over a public vuln release, or a wake-up call.

I think we can do better as an industry.

[ reply ]
Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 08:15PM
Brian Loe (knobdy gmail com) (1 replies)
Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 08:37PM
Adrian Griffis (adriang63 gmail com) (2 replies)
Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 09:05PM
Andrew Weaver (aweaver ee net)
Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 08:54PM
Brian Loe (knobdy gmail com)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 24 2007 09:59PM
Crispin Cowan (crispin novell com) (1 replies)
Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 25 2007 01:39PM
J. Oquendo (sil infiltrated net)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 21 2007 06:34PM
Casper Dik Sun COM (1 replies)
Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 21 2007 07:24PM
J. Oquendo (sil infiltrated net)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus