SecurityFocus

0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 20 2007 01:21PM
pdp (architect) (pdp gnucitizen googlemail com) (3 replies)

Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 21 2007 07:53PM
Thierry Zoller (Thierry Zoller lu) (2 replies)

Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 21 2007 09:21PM
Aaron Collins (collinsa ehawaii gov)

Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 21 2007 09:21PM
Kevin Finisterre (lists) (kf_lists digitalmunition com)

Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 20 2007 04:55PM
Aditya K Sood (zeroknock secniche org)

Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 20 2007 03:29PM
Gadi Evron (ge linuxbox org) (1 replies)

Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 20 2007 11:16PM
Crispin Cowan (crispin novell com) (2 replies)

Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 23 2007 05:34AM
Crispin Cowan (crispin novell com) (2 replies)

Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 25 2007 04:15PM
Iggy E (iggy_e yahoo com)

Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 23 2007 11:52PM
Chad Perrin (perrin apotheon com) (2 replies)

Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 24 2007 10:57PM
Lamont Granquist (lamont scriptkiddie org) (1 replies)

Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 25 2007 05:57PM
Roland Kuhn (rkuhn e18 physik tu-muenchen de) (1 replies)

RE: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 25 2007 06:39PM
Thor (Hammer of God) (thor hammerofgod com) (2 replies)

Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 25 2007 09:03PM
Steve Shockley (steve shockley shockley net)

defining 0day Sep 25 2007 07:02PM
Gadi Evron (ge linuxbox org) (3 replies)

RE: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 09:20PM
David Gillett (gillettdavid fhda edu)

Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 08:40PM
Charles Miller (cmiller pastiche org) (2 replies)

Re: defining 0day Sep 26 2007 11:25PM
Zow Terry Brugger (zow llnl gov) (1 replies)

Re: defining 0day Sep 26 2007 11:10PM
Chad Perrin (perrin apotheon com) (1 replies)

RE: defining 0day Sep 28 2007 12:20AM
Marvin Simkin (Marvin Simkin asu edu) (1 replies)

Re: defining 0day Sep 27 2007 06:34PM
Chad Perrin (perrin apotheon com)

On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 05:20:35PM -0700, Marvin Simkin wrote:
> > Unpatched Vulnerability: Working Exploit
>
> "Working in a white hat's lab" is not as urgent as "being abused right now in the wild".
>
> > . . . or maybe "zero day exploit".
>
> Proposed:
>
> 1. A 0-day EXPLOIT is an Unpatched Vulnerability that we realize is being or has been abused.
>
> 2. A 0-day VULNERABILITY: no such thing. All vulnerabilities are either Unpatched or Patched. They start out in Unpatched status the moment some programmer creates them. They remain Unpatched until they are Patched.
>

That was pretty much my point -- so I'm on board.

--
CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
Leon Festinger: "A man with a conviction is a hard man to change. Tell him
you disagree and he turns away. Show him facts and figures and he questions
your sources. Appeal to logic and he fails to see your point."

[ reply ]

Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 08:57PM
Gadi Evron (ge linuxbox org)

Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 07:51PM
Brian Loe (knobdy gmail com) (1 replies)

Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 07:59PM
Gadi Evron (ge linuxbox org) (1 replies)

Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 08:15PM
Brian Loe (knobdy gmail com) (1 replies)

Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 08:37PM
Adrian Griffis (adriang63 gmail com) (2 replies)

Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 09:05PM
Andrew Weaver (aweaver ee net)

Re: defining 0day Sep 25 2007 08:54PM
Brian Loe (knobdy gmail com)

Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 24 2007 09:59PM
Crispin Cowan (crispin novell com) (1 replies)

Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 25 2007 01:39PM
J. Oquendo (sil infiltrated net)

Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 21 2007 06:34PM
Casper Dik Sun COM (1 replies)

Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Sep 21 2007 07:24PM
J. Oquendo (sil infiltrated net)