|
Penetration Testing
Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 05 2008 06:15PM Jon Kibler (Jon Kibler aset com) (7 replies) Re: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 08 2008 10:51PM M.B.Jr. (marcio barbado gmail com) (1 replies) Re: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 09 2008 04:56AM Jon Kibler (Jon Kibler aset com) Re: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 08 2008 09:39PM Kurt Buff (kurt buff gmail com) Re: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 06 2008 05:23PM R. DuFresne (dufresne sysinfo com) (1 replies) RE: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 06 2008 10:32PM Ray Chow (Ray Chow dia govt nz) (1 replies) RE: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 07 2008 01:18AM R. DuFresne (dufresne sysinfo com) (1 replies) Re: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 07 2008 10:28AM Matt - MRS Security (matt mrssecurity com) (1 replies) RE: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 06 2008 11:47AM John Babio (jbabio po-box esu edu) Re: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 05 2008 11:59PM Jay D. Dyson (jdyson treachery net) (4 replies) Re: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 08 2008 07:40AM Dragos Ruiu (dr kyx net) Re: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 06 2008 06:04PM Matt - MRS Security (matt mrssecurity com) Re: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 06 2008 02:28AM brendan (xasperated gmail com) (2 replies) Re: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 06 2008 05:25AM Jimmy Brokaw (hedgie hedgie com) Re: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 06 2008 03:43AM Jay D. Dyson (jdyson treachery net) (1 replies) Re: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 06 2008 08:42AM David Howe (DaveHowe Pentest googlemail com) Re: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 06 2008 01:50AM Jon Kibler (Jon Kibler aset com) (1 replies) Re: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 06 2008 04:37PM John Mason Jr (john mason jr cox net) Re: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 05 2008 07:57PM Mario Platt (mplatt gmail com) (1 replies) Re: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 05 2008 09:01PM Jon Kibler (Jon Kibler aset com) Re: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 05 2008 07:19PM Terry Cutler (jedi31337 gmail com) (1 replies) Re: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on? Oct 06 2008 08:12AM David Howe (DaveHowe Pentest googlemail com) |
|
|
Privacy Statement |
infrastructure please email me their CVs :)
I agree on the technical interview - this is essential.
I like to present a portscan of a test box on paper and ask them to tell
me what the box is, major and minor versions where it can be identified,
and then describe a likely set of attacks / vulnerabilities for the
system.
When someone retorts, "err, it's a Windows box" or "I think it's a Unix
system" they've normally blown it big style but the good news is, they
know they have, so there's never any come back from HR etc.
cheers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: listbounce (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
> [mailto:listbounce (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]] On Behalf Of Matt - MRS Security
> Sent: 07 October 2008 11:29
> To: R. DuFresne
> Cc: Ray Chow; Jon Kibler; pen-test (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]; pen-test-return-
> 1078487202 (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]; pen-test-return-
> 1078487229 (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
> Subject: Re: Certifications: Not worth the paper they are printed on?
>
> Really?
>
> (opening can of worms)
>
> My previous experience of recruiters is that they will happily market
> anyone and its usually previous job experience that gets you through
> the
> door along with recommendations. I know because that is the case with
> me.
>
> In terms with joining an pentest company we have have all CV's from
> recruiters (or HR) sent to the team leader, who then decides on who
> they
> interview, then once in the interview they are accessed on technical
> abilities and if they will be suitable to the team, then if we like
> them
> during said interview we put them on a Vmware based assult course and
> ask them to demonstrate said abilities. Sorts the men from the boys.
>
> We dont look for people with CISSP (its nice if you have it, but your
> more of a security consultant (sorry!!) than a pen-test consultant; we
> dont actively push people to CISSP or CCNA - we want people with CREST
> or CHECK or in a position to be able to easily pass it.
>
> cheers.
>
--
E-MAIL DISCLAIMER
The information contained in this email and any subsequent
correspondence is private, is solely for the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential or privileged information. For those other than
the intended recipient(s), any disclosure, copying, distribution, or any
other action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance on such
information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the
intended recipient and have received this message in error, please
inform the sender and delete this mail and any attachments.
The views expressed in this email do not necessarily reflect NGS policy.
NGS accepts no liability or responsibility for any onward transmission
or use of emails and attachments having left the NGS domain.
NGS and NGSSoftware are trading names of Next Generation Security
Software Ltd. Registered office address: 52 Throwley Way, Sutton, SM1
4BF with Company Number 04225835 and VAT Number 783096402
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Cenzic
Security Trends Report from Cenzic
Stay Ahead of the Hacker Curve!
Get the latest Q2 2008 Trends Report now
www.cenzic.com/landing/trends-report
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ reply ]