|
Penetration Testing
PCI Compliance Scope Nov 12 2009 03:27PM Danux (danuxx gmail com) (4 replies) RE: PCI Compliance Scope Nov 12 2009 09:52PM Bakshi, Narinder (FIN) (Narinder Bakshi ontario ca) (1 replies) RE: PCI Compliance Scope Nov 12 2009 07:13PM Erin Carroll (amoeba amoebazone com) (2 replies) Re: PCI Compliance Scope Nov 12 2009 09:32PM David Glosser (david glosser gmail com) (1 replies) |
|
|
Privacy Statement |
> Basically the fear are base camps from which to launch an attack.
> As Erin stated below, if there are measures in place (not just
> vlans) to prevent access from the log machine to the Card Holder
> data environment then it may be that the device will be out of
> scope.
Why not just VLANs? Do we not trust VLANs or are we worried about VLAN
misconfiguration? Or switch compromise? Cisco commissioned a study by
@Stake (IIRC) which made a pretty good case for VLAN security. Of
course, that may just be Cisco getting the results it paid for. But it
seemed reasonable to me.
--
Tracy Reed
http://tracyreed.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFK/H6G9PIYKZYVAq0RAo5eAKCFR/M3RD1Nzkkae/1C39cgMdDbxwCeJqnk
YochM0FyeIqcT8uy2zTIjro=
=S/g9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[ reply ]