Penetration Testing
University plan Sep 17 2010 04:32PM
kalgecin (kalgecin gmail com) (6 replies)
Re: University plan Sep 18 2010 03:57PM
Todd Haverkos (infosec haverkos com)
RE: University plan Sep 18 2010 10:01AM
Cathryn Olds (catholds hotmail com)
Re: University plan Sep 18 2010 02:23AM
Tim (tim-pentest sentinelchicken org) (2 replies)
Re: University plan Sep 18 2010 08:12PM
Mark Miller (mark mirell org)
Re: University plan Sep 18 2010 05:32AM
kalgecin (kalgecin gmail com)
Re: University plan Sep 18 2010 12:43AM
Alexander Chayka (a s chayka gmail com) (2 replies)
RE: University plan Sep 18 2010 01:54PM
Jalal Atik (jatik atikmaroc com)
Re: University plan Sep 18 2010 09:01AM
Blyth A J C (AT) (ajcblyth glam ac uk) (1 replies)
RE: University plan Oct 19 2010 11:51AM
Charlton, Ceri (CSS) (Ceri Charlton capita co uk) (1 replies)
Re: University plan Oct 22 2010 08:45PM
Dan Crowley (dcrowley coresecurity com)
Re: University plan Sep 18 2010 12:04AM
Brian Boyter (boyter swbell net) (1 replies)
Re: University plan Sep 19 2010 09:26PM
Riley, Jack W ERDC-ITL-MS (Jack W Riley usace army mil)
Re: University plan Sep 17 2010 11:16PM
Adam Mooz (adam mooz gmail com) (1 replies)
Re: University plan Sep 17 2010 11:58PM
James Copeland (james copeland gmail com)
I have to interject on that. I think that it depends on the
university. For my undergrad, it was a combination of theoretical and
practical. They tried to give you a combination of both.

For the original question though, I would say that more classroom
based is the way to go. I don't know about others, but I feel that
doing the classes online is more almost like setting up a home lab and
learning by yourself except that you have a time table to learn by.
Granted in brick and mortar universities you still have that time
table but you also get to bounce ideas off others and you can also
have someone there that will typically help you if you get stuck.
Plus you won't have to shell out the money for the equipment. I was a
poor college kid once so I know how that is.

Overall, though, no matter where you go, you will only get out of it
what you put into it. I know that that is cliche but that is the
truth. I saw it time and again as a TA in college.

On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 18:16, Adam Mooz <adam.mooz (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]> wrote:
> Well, for starters if you want practical you're looking at colleges.  Universities are more theoretical by nature for their undergrads.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Adam Mooz
> "In technology I'm placing all my trust"
> http://www.AdamMooz.com
>
> On 2010-09-17, at 12:32 PM, kalgecin wrote:
>
>> hey guys,
>> I'm in my final year of high school and I'm planning to go to
>> university. As all people, I have trouble finding the right one ( or a
>> good one ). So I'm asking you people to recommend any nice
>> universities that teach good computer security, that is more practical
>> than theoretical. Please also tell me to which university you attended
>> and how was it? and any other general advice
>>
>> --
>> Kalgecin
>> http://code.google.com/p/kalgecin
>> http://kalgecin.110mb.com
>> http://kalgecin.110mb.com/forums
>> http://kalgecin.blogspot.com
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

>> This list is sponsored by: Information Assurance Certification Review Board
>>
>> Prove to peers and potential employers without a doubt that you can actually do a proper penetration test. IACRB CPT and CEPT certs require a full practical examination in order to become certified.
>>
>> http://www.iacertification.org
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

>>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------

This list is sponsored by: Information Assurance Certification Review Board

Prove to peers and potential employers without a doubt that you can actually do a proper penetration test. IACRB CPT and CEPT certs require a full practical examination in order to become certified.

http://www.iacertification.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[ reply ]


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus