On Dec 7, 2010, at 6:27 AM, J. Oquendo wrote:
>
> This is a humorous and misguided comment, sorry - that's my opinion. I
> implore you and anyone else to take a look around at 1/3rd of the
> "cybercrimes" committed (I say one third because its easy pickins).
> Ready? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
> Lies,_damned_lies,_and_statistics)
>
> If we do some quick math, of the 12 cases that immediately sprout up
> on
> Cybercrime.gov, you should be fearing normal individuals more than you
> should be fearing a "convicted" felon with regards to "cybercrime." In
> fact, not ONE CASE on that site mentions ANYONE as having "former
> record"

Yes, I was just going to mention didn't you spend some time with Uncle
Fed?

http://www.justice.gov/criminal/cybercrime/OquendoSent.htm

I'm glad you came out ahead and contribute - may I also add that the
Fedz make huge mistakes? They think you're
doing it, throw tremendous resources at you to prove your doing
something nefarious...yet when it comes time to actually
determining your nefarious deeds...well....

On another point, the reason why none have a former record is that the
people with serious records rarely get another INFOSEC job..methinks
you're an exception rather than a rule.

A pleasant exception, and a loquacious one at that!

-jc

"There is not a crime, there is not a dodge, there is not a trick,
there is not a swindle, there is not a vice which does not live by
secrecy." ? Joseph Pulitzer

------------------------------------------------------------------------

This list is sponsored by: Information Assurance Certification Review Board

Prove to peers and potential employers without a doubt that you can actually do a proper penetration test. IACRB CPT and CEPT certs require a full practical examination in order to become certified.

http://www.iacertification.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[ reply ]