Security Basics
Why isn't full disk encryption from manufactures a slam dunk? Sep 12 2007 04:16PM
dan recyclepcs com (6 replies)
Re: Why isn't full disk encryption from manufactures a slam dunk? Sep 17 2007 09:21PM
Michael Painter (tvhawaii shaka com)
Re: Why isn't full disk encryption from manufactures a slam dunk? Sep 15 2007 02:44AM
Daniel Anderson (dtndan gmail com)
Re: Why isn't full disk encryption from manufactures a slam dunk? Sep 14 2007 02:18PM
Nick Owen (nickowen mindspring com)
Re: Why isn't full disk encryption from manufactures a slam dunk? Sep 13 2007 12:56PM
James Fryman (james frymanet com)
dan (at) recyclepcs (dot) com [email concealed] wrote:
> This would seem to be a security no brainer. What are its limitations?
>

To add on what has already been pointed out - Crypto changes. Today,
<insert favorite strength of AES> or whatever flavor of crypto you use
is practically secure for the necessary lifetime or duration of the data
being protected. That could change tomorrow, and lock-in from the
particular vendor on the type of crypto in hardware is going to prevent
upgrades if the algorithm is found with a flaw, or brute-force attacks
increase with such vigor as to find a way around the cryptography.
(read: quantum computing). It is a long shot, but needs to be considered
in the scope of the risk assessment for choosing a hardware or software
based FDE solution.

My $0.02 in the pot.

Hope you find the answers you are looking for.

-James

--
-------------
James Fryman

[ reply ]
Re: Why isn't full disk encryption from manufactures a slam dunk? Sep 12 2007 08:10PM
gjgowey tmo blackberry net
Re: Why isn't full disk encryption from manufactures a slam dunk? Sep 12 2007 08:10PM
Kurt Buff (kurt buff gmail com)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus