|
Security Basics
Removing ping/icmp from a network Mar 25 2008 04:29PM Secure This (lists securethis net) (7 replies) Re: Removing ping/icmp from a network Mar 26 2008 02:55PM Jason Thompson (securitux gmail com) (4 replies) Re: Removing ping/icmp from a network Mar 26 2008 07:08PM Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (bugtraq planetcobalt net) (2 replies) Re: Removing ping/icmp from a network Mar 27 2008 04:25PM Jason (securitux gmail com) (2 replies) Re: Removing ping/icmp from a network Mar 27 2008 11:29PM Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (bugtraq planetcobalt net) (1 replies) Re: Removing ping/icmp from a network Mar 28 2008 04:34PM Jason (securitux gmail com) (1 replies) Re: Removing ping/icmp from a network Mar 29 2008 07:35PM Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (bugtraq planetcobalt net) (1 replies) Re: Removing ping/icmp from a network Mar 31 2008 10:29PM Jason (securitux gmail com) (1 replies) Re: Removing ping/icmp from a network Apr 04 2008 12:28PM Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (bugtraq planetcobalt net) (2 replies) Re: Removing ping/icmp from a network Apr 05 2008 05:17PM Mark Owen (mr markowen gmail com) (1 replies) Re: Removing ping/icmp from a network Apr 05 2008 12:06AM Jason (securitux gmail com) (1 replies) Re: Removing ping/icmp from a network Apr 06 2008 02:54PM Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (bugtraq planetcobalt net) (1 replies) Re: Removing ping/icmp from a network Mar 27 2008 05:09PM Mark Owen (mr markowen gmail com) (2 replies) R: Removing ping/icmp from a network Mar 27 2008 06:33PM Vega - Brunello Ivan (I Brunello vegaspa it) Re: Removing ping/icmp from a network Mar 25 2008 05:32PM Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (bugtraq planetcobalt net) Re: Removing ping/icmp from a network Mar 25 2008 05:17PM Jon R. Kibler (Jon Kibler aset com) (1 replies) Re: Removing ping/icmp from a network Mar 26 2008 12:13PM Secure This (lists securethis net) (1 replies) DoD aproved disk wiping tool Mar 27 2008 01:31PM JP Vicente (jvicente asft net) (4 replies) RE: DoD approved disk wiping tool Mar 27 2008 11:38PM Steve Armstrong (stevearmstrong logicallysecure com) (1 replies) RE: DoD aproved disk wiping tool Mar 27 2008 07:50PM Kevin Ortloff (Kevin Ortloff j2global com) (1 replies) Re: DoD aproved disk wiping tool Mar 27 2008 04:56PM John Syers (jsyers acm org) (1 replies) RE: DoD aproved disk wiping tool Mar 27 2008 03:21PM Timmothy Lester (Timmothy Lester primeadvisors com) RE: Removing ping/icmp from a network Mar 25 2008 04:56PM Hopke, Greg (GHopke libertymgt com) (1 replies) Re: Removing ping/icmp from a network Mar 25 2008 06:12PM Mark Owen (mr markowen gmail com) (2 replies) RE: Removing ping/icmp from a network Mar 26 2008 01:58PM Ramsdell, Scott (Scott Ramsdell cellnethunt com) (1 replies) Re: Removing ping/icmp from a network Mar 26 2008 06:44PM Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (bugtraq planetcobalt net) (1 replies) RE: Removing ping/icmp from a network Mar 27 2008 02:19PM Ramsdell, Scott (Scott Ramsdell cellnethunt com) (1 replies) Re: Removing ping/icmp from a network Mar 27 2008 02:34PM Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (bugtraq planetcobalt net) |
|
|
Privacy Statement |
the way to the hop before the firewall, then you have narrowed down
where the issue is.
From there, what about network analysis and application monitoring
tools? What about tcpdump, ethereal, etc? Can that not be used that to
check network and server latency / response times on a standard web
request?
We have a customer in Australia who's ISP blocks all ICMP to and from
their CPE routers. We seem to get along just fine. Web site is down or
is slow and the router before the CPE is responding, dump the packets,
look at the timestamps and see what's going on. IP packet traces spit
back latency just fine with or without ICMP. Problem inside the CPE?
Use remote management tools over a VPN to troubleshoot further (if you
manage the server of course).
Reputation is not going to change based on whether ICMP is allowed or
not... if the web site is down its down, clients aren't going to care
if they can ping it or not if they can't access their data through SSL
or whichever protocol either way. "Well I can't do my job, but this is
a stable server because I can ping it".
Plus, if you absolutely must have ICMP to troubleshoot from the
Internet, firewall rules can be used to narrow the source and
destination as someone else in this thread suggested. I may have given
too much of a blanket statement when saying no ICMP from the Internet
at all, I should have said no open ICMP. Controlled ICMP through a
firewall with proper rules should be good.
I don't consider MS's site unreliable just because I, or anyone on the
Internet for that matter, can't ping it.
-J
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Mark Owen <mr.markowen (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Jason <securitux (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]> wrote:
> *snip*
> > The idea is to limit your Internet footprint to make it as difficult
> > as possible for an attacker. There is no need for a web server to
> > respond to ping from the Internet for example.
>
> It is very critical that your web server responds to ICMP on the
> Internet. If you go out of the way and ignore essential protocols for
> IP over a public network, you're just going to create a headache for
> all of us.
>
> Without ICMP, it is very difficult for us to determine where a problem
> exists when our clients complain about slow load times or
> inaccessibility to your website. No ICMP means no basic trace
> routing, no basic latency checks, and no basic error reporting. So
> even if the problem is somewhere in our infrastructure that limits or
> prevents access to your site, you're going to get the blame and bad
> reputation of an unstable server. If it doesn't respond to ping, and
> can't be traced, its not our fault that our client can't access your
> site, it's yours.
>
> --
> Mark Owen
>
[ reply ]