Security Basics
RDP over the internet Jan 10 2012 05:22PM
mariofa88 gmail com (6 replies)
Re: RDP over the internet Jan 11 2012 10:54PM
Hosts Deny (hosts deny gmail com) (1 replies)
Re: RDP over the internet Jan 11 2012 11:57PM
synja synfulvisions com
RE: RDP over the internet Jan 10 2012 10:10PM
David Gillett (gillettdavid fhda edu)
Re: RDP over the internet Jan 10 2012 06:22PM
William Söderberg (william soderberg gmail com)
Re: RDP over the internet Jan 10 2012 05:49PM
Andre Silaghi (andre silaghi googlemail com)
RE: RDP over the internet Jan 10 2012 05:47PM
William Baltas (bill baltas cleanwaterteam com) (2 replies)
RE: RDP over the internet Jan 10 2012 06:35PM
Dimitrios Hilton (dhilton theitguy us)
Re: RDP over the internet Jan 10 2012 06:00PM
Mike Hale (eyeronic design gmail com) (4 replies)
Re: RDP over the internet Mar 14 2012 01:41PM
Alex Fiuvertiz (fiuvertiz gmail com) (3 replies)
RE: RDP over the internet Jul 18 2012 09:53AM
Juha Jurvanen (juha jurvanen redcloud se)
Re: RDP over the internet Mar 16 2012 09:29AM
Ansgar Wiechers (bugtraq planetcobalt net) (1 replies)
Re: RDP over the internet Mar 17 2012 01:46PM
Thugzclub (thugzclub googlemail com) (1 replies)
Re: RDP over the internet Mar 17 2012 06:04PM
Ansgar Wiechers (bugtraq planetcobalt net) (1 replies)
RE: RDP over the internet Mar 19 2012 05:05PM
Dan Lynch (DLynch placer ca gov) (1 replies)
Re: RDP over the internet Mar 19 2012 06:52PM
Ansgar Wiechers (bugtraq planetcobalt net) (1 replies)
Re: RDP over the internet Mar 21 2012 04:51PM
Thugzclub Thugzclub (thugzclub googlemail com)
On 19 March 2012 18:52, Ansgar Wiechers <bugtraq (at) planetcobalt (dot) net [email concealed]> wrote:
> On 2012-03-19 Dan Lynch wrote:
>>>>> New vulnerabilities will be discovered every now and then. Duh. The
>>>>> question is: do they get fixed in a timely manner?
>>>>
>>>> The fact is that "open port" is a potential attack vector because a
>>>> vulnerability may be discovered in the application.
>>>
>>> I'm sorry to have to break this to you, but as long as you're using
>>> TCP/IP you need an open port if you want to be able to establish a
>>> connection.
>> But it's clear that *any* open port represents additional risk. If
>> that open port is not required for the function of the system (as
>> terminal services/RDP generally is not), it's an unnecessary risk
>> (however convenient it might be). And that risk is compounded if that
>> port is running by necessity with system level permissions, and
>> offering up a login screen that people use with their admin
>> credentials. Also, terminal services is dependent on the loading of
>> yet another service: RPC.

This is my point exactly - any port represent an attack vector. This
is not to say that you should not have open ports (you cannot operate
without ports), but rather, you should congnisant of the fact that if
a vulnerability is identified in the listening application, you may be
vulnerabile.

Software restrictions solutions (i.e AppLocker) are not a panacea, but
they CAN protect you to a certain extent. The article from SANS
provide a "good" (not comprehensive) analysis of their limitations:
http://www.sans.org/reading_room/whitepapers/sysadmin/application-whitel
isting-panacea-propaganda_33599

Its correct that assuming the RDP service is running in the context of
system and is exploited by malware, you are truly buggered. However
you can mitigate this by employing least privileges. RDP should be
running in the local context (not Domain Admin or System) with the
minimum set of privileges required.

But you cannot stop there, if using Windows, look at DEP for buffer
overflow protection and a reasonable HIPS.

The key is defence in depth and this should be applied for all
externally facing system.

>> For these reasons, I don't believe the concern expressed over exposing
>> RDP to the internet is "a massive generalisation". I think that
>> concern is clearly justified.
>
> Indeed. And I didn't write anything about "massive generalisation". I
> did, however, want to point out that one newly discovered vulnerability
> is no proof whatsoever for a claim about unpatched vulnerabilities.
>
>> RDP is not of the same risk level as, say NTP.
>
> I'd argue that the complexity of VPN (or SSH) services is closer to RDP
> than to NTP, though. ;)
>
>> And if, when we point out that risk, CEOs then see security officers
>> as "the enemy", it's because the security folks have failed to (1)
>> account for the value in the convenience offered by things like RDP,
>> (2) reasonably evaluate that value against the risk, and (3) consider
>> what actions, configurations and technologies are available to
>> mitigate the risk.
>
> No argument there. And FTR: personally I do prefer using RDP through
> encrypted tunnels, even though RDP itself is an encrypted protocol.
>
> Regards
> Ansgar Wiechers
> --
> "All vulnerabilities deserve a public fear period prior to patches
> becoming available."
> --Jason Coombs on Bugtraq
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Securing Apache Web Server with thawte Digital Certificate
> In this guide we examine the importance of Apache-SSL and who needs an SSL certificate.  We look at how SSL works, how it benefits your company and how your customers can tell if a site is secure. You will find out how to test, purchase, install and use a thawte Digital Certificate on your Apache web server. Throughout, best practices for set-up are highlighted to help you ensure efficient ongoing management of your encryption keys and digital certificates.
>
> http://www.dinclinx.com/Redirect.aspx?36;4175;25;1371;0;5;946;e13b6be442
f727d1
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

>

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Securing Apache Web Server with thawte Digital Certificate
In this guide we examine the importance of Apache-SSL and who needs an SSL certificate. We look at how SSL works, how it benefits your company and how your customers can tell if a site is secure. You will find out how to test, purchase, install and use a thawte Digital Certificate on your Apache web server. Throughout, best practices for set-up are highlighted to help you ensure efficient ongoing management of your encryption keys and digital certificates.

http://www.dinclinx.com/Redirect.aspx?36;4175;25;1371;0;5;946;e13b6be442
f727d1
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[ reply ]
Re: RDP over the internet Mar 15 2012 06:43AM
Mike Hale (eyeronic design gmail com) (1 replies)
Re: RDP over the internet Mar 15 2012 10:12PM
Thugzclub (thugzclub googlemail com) (3 replies)
RE: RDP over the internet Mar 16 2012 11:24AM
Dave Wray (david wray sec-tec co uk) (2 replies)
Re: RDP over the internet Mar 16 2012 11:25PM
David J2 (davidj2 hotmail com)
Re: RDP over the internet Mar 16 2012 03:24PM
synja synfulvisions com
Re: RDP over the internet Mar 16 2012 07:31AM
Melissa Augustine (missy augustine gmail com)
Re: RDP over the internet Mar 16 2012 06:35AM
Banyan He (banyan rootong com)
Re: RDP over the internet Jan 10 2012 06:46PM
joseph itsec-asia com (2 replies)
Re: RDP over the internet Jan 10 2012 07:29PM
Ansgar Wiechers (bugtraq planetcobalt net) (1 replies)
Re: RDP over the internet Jan 10 2012 10:05PM
security (at) stealthnodes (dot) com [email concealed] (security stealthnodes com)
Re: RDP over the internet Jan 10 2012 07:25PM
Andre Silaghi (andre silaghi googlemail com) (1 replies)
Re: RDP over the internet Jan 10 2012 09:45PM
Lee Fisher (blibbet gmail com)
Re: RDP over the internet Jan 10 2012 06:43PM
Ricardo Ferreira (ricardo ferreira sotechdatacenter com br) (2 replies)
Re: RDP over the internet Jan 10 2012 07:27PM
Ansgar Wiechers (bugtraq planetcobalt net)
Re: RDP over the internet Jan 10 2012 07:27PM
Mike Hale (eyeronic design gmail com)
RE: RDP over the internet Jan 10 2012 06:35PM
Dimitrios Hilton (dhilton theitguy us)
Re: RDP over the internet Jan 10 2012 05:38PM
Matias Katz (matias matiaskatz com)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus