Security Basics
Spam prevention vs mitigation Apr 12 2012 04:04PM
Steve Sirag (stevesirag gmail com) (8 replies)
RE: Spam prevention vs mitigation Apr 13 2012 05:27PM
Mike Saldivar (Mike Saldivar usurf usu edu)
Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation Apr 13 2012 07:14AM
Ansgar Wiechers (bugtraq planetcobalt net)
Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation Apr 12 2012 06:24PM
Clint Davis (cdavis grayloon com) (1 replies)
Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation Apr 12 2012 10:04PM
Champ Clark III (cclark quadrantsec com) (1 replies)
RE: Spam prevention vs mitigation Apr 12 2012 11:08PM
Gillmer, Renier, VF-NZ (Renier Gillmer vodafone com)
Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation Apr 12 2012 05:37PM
Todd Haverkos (infosec haverkos com) (2 replies)
RE: Spam prevention vs mitigation Apr 12 2012 09:56PM
Joseph Laico (LAICO 0IS US)
Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation Apr 12 2012 09:56PM
Champ Clark III (cclark quadrantsec com)
RE: Spam prevention vs mitigation Apr 12 2012 05:00PM
Steve Melcher (smelcher pfgbest com)
RE: Spam prevention vs mitigation Apr 12 2012 04:57PM
Erik Soosalu (erik soosalu calyxinc com) (1 replies)
The issue with attempting 100% spam prevention is that the false
positive rate will go up. So if you catch 100% of the spam, but lose 1%
of your email to false positives, is that a good thing?

That being said, a let through rate of 3-6 spam/user/day is overly high.

Thanks,
Erik

-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed] [mailto:listbounce (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]]
On Behalf Of Steve Sirag
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 12:05 PM
To: security-basics (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
Subject: Spam prevention vs mitigation

Hi,

My bosses are demanding 100% spam prevention, and I'd like to find some
industry papers, articles, etc that explains why that's not advisable
(if
even possible). My understanding is that spam mitigation is the goal,
keeping spam down to where it's not a distraction from business. Our
current spam level is roughly 3-6 spams received per user per day. That
seems manageable to me, but I'd like the extra ammunition going into the
meeting.

Can anyone help?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Securing Apache Web Server with thawte Digital Certificate
In this guide we examine the importance of Apache-SSL and who needs an
SSL certificate. We look at how SSL works, how it benefits your company
and how your customers can tell if a site is secure. You will find out
how to test, purchase, install and use a thawte Digital Certificate on
your Apache web server. Throughout, best practices for set-up are
highlighted to help you ensure efficient ongoing management of your
encryption keys and digital certificates.

http://www.dinclinx.com/Redirect.aspx?36;4175;25;1371;0;5;946;e13b6be442

f727d1
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Securing Apache Web Server with thawte Digital Certificate
In this guide we examine the importance of Apache-SSL and who needs an SSL certificate. We look at how SSL works, how it benefits your company and how your customers can tell if a site is secure. You will find out how to test, purchase, install and use a thawte Digital Certificate on your Apache web server. Throughout, best practices for set-up are highlighted to help you ensure efficient ongoing management of your encryption keys and digital certificates.

http://www.dinclinx.com/Redirect.aspx?36;4175;25;1371;0;5;946;e13b6be442
f727d1
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[ reply ]
Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation Apr 12 2012 10:03PM
Champ Clark III (cclark quadrantsec com)
Re: Spam prevention vs mitigation Apr 12 2012 04:50PM
List Man (list man bluejeantime com)
RE: Spam prevention vs mitigation Apr 12 2012 04:43PM
Ivan Carlos (icarlos icarlos net)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus