|
Web Application Security
Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 07:41AM test future gmail com (14 replies) Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 08:06PM Robert Hajime Lanning (robert lanning gmail com) RE: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 12:40PM Rod Divilbiss (rod rodsdot com) (1 replies) RE: Is logoff feature necessary May 03 2006 10:59AM Auri Rahimzadeh (auri auri net) (2 replies) Administrivia: Is logoff feature necessary May 03 2006 12:53PM Andrew van der Stock (vanderaj greebo net) Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 09:32AM Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha (strange nsk no-ip org) |
|
|
Privacy Statement |
Am Dienstag, 2. Mai 2006 09:41 schrieb test.future (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]:
> We have a web applicaiton which do not have logoff button. The developer
> claims that it is unnecessary, since the session can be terminated by
> closing the browser. Is it correct? Thanks.
When the browser is closed, it usually loses its session token (e. g.
a cookie), so the browser has no way to re-enter the session.
However, on the server side the session will persist until it times
out. So if someone steals the session token, he can continue using the
session even if the original user closes his browser.
So technically what your developer says is *not* correct.
Bye,
Peter
--
Peter Conrad Tel: +49 6102 / 80 99 072
[ t]ivano Software GmbH Fax: +49 6102 / 80 99 071
Bahnhofstr. 18 http://www.tivano.de/
63263 Neu-Isenburg
Germany
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Sponsored by: Watchfire
The Twelve Most Common Application-level Hack Attacks
Hackers continue to add billions to the cost of doing business online
despite security executives' efforts to prevent malicious attacks. This
whitepaper identifies the most common methods of attacks that we have seen,
and outlines a guideline for developing secure web applications.
Download this whitepaper today!
https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/whitepapers.aspx?id=701300000007t9r
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
[ reply ]