Search: Home Bugtraq Vulnerabilities Mailing Lists Jobs Tools Beta Programs
Web Application Security
Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 07:41AM
test future gmail com (14 replies)
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 03 2006 11:19AM
Alexis FitzGerald (alexis iol ie)
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 08:06PM
Robert Hajime Lanning (robert lanning gmail com)
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 04:57PM
Alexander Bolante (alexander bolante gmail com)
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 04:32PM
Dave Ferguson (gmdavef gmail com)
RE: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 03:42PM
M. Burnett (mb xato net)
RE: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 01:07PM
wa0qmj (bugtraq jvedman com)
RE: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 12:40PM
Rod Divilbiss (rod rodsdot com) (1 replies)
RE: Is logoff feature necessary May 03 2006 10:59AM
Auri Rahimzadeh (auri auri net) (2 replies)
Administrivia: Is logoff feature necessary May 03 2006 12:53PM
Andrew van der Stock (vanderaj greebo net)
RE: Is logoff feature necessary May 03 2006 12:45PM
Keith Duffin (kduffin duffin org) (1 replies)
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 03 2006 01:30PM
Andrew van der Stock (vanderaj greebo net)
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 11:22AM
Michael Silk (michaelslists gmail com)
RE: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 09:56AM
Deepu Thomas Philip (deepu philip paladion net)
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 09:47AM
ViersOnline (viers free fr)
If the developer says so, he coded it. He has surely set a cookie, a
phpsessionid, or whatever, valid just for a session (in short yes it's
possible to do it).
Hard to say if he did what he pretended to do, without more information.

But if you have any doubt, why not just checking by yourself?

Login, close the browser, restart, try to get acces to the webapp
without logging in again, and check wether he's right.

--
viers

test.future (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed] wrote:

>We have a web applicaiton which do not have logoff button. The developer claims that it is unnecessary, since the session can be terminated by closing the browser. Is it correct? Thanks.
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>Sponsored by: Watchfire
>
>The Twelve Most Common Application-level Hack Attacks
>Hackers continue to add billions to the cost of doing business online
>despite security executives' efforts to prevent malicious attacks. This
>whitepaper identifies the most common methods of attacks that we have seen,
>and outlines a guideline for developing secure web applications.
>Download this whitepaper today!
>
>https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/whitepapers.aspx?id=701300000007t9
r
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>
>
>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Sponsored by: Watchfire

The Twelve Most Common Application-level Hack Attacks
Hackers continue to add billions to the cost of doing business online
despite security executives' efforts to prevent malicious attacks. This
whitepaper identifies the most common methods of attacks that we have seen,
and outlines a guideline for developing secure web applications.
Download this whitepaper today!

https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/whitepapers.aspx?id=701300000007t9r

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

[ reply ]
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 09:32AM
Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha (strange nsk no-ip org)
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 09:24AM
Peter Conrad (conrad tivano de)
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 09:22AM
Daniel Persson (mailto woden gmail com)
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 09:14AM
Vicente Aguilera (vaguilera isecauditors com)







 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2009, SecurityFocus