Web Application Security
Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 07:41AM
test future gmail com (14 replies)
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 03 2006 11:19AM
Alexis FitzGerald (alexis iol ie)
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 08:06PM
Robert Hajime Lanning (robert lanning gmail com)
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 04:57PM
Alexander Bolante (alexander bolante gmail com)
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 04:32PM
Dave Ferguson (gmdavef gmail com)
RE: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 03:42PM
M. Burnett (mb xato net)
RE: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 01:07PM
wa0qmj (bugtraq jvedman com)
RE: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 12:40PM
Rod Divilbiss (rod rodsdot com) (1 replies)
RE: Is logoff feature necessary May 03 2006 10:59AM
Auri Rahimzadeh (auri auri net) (2 replies)
Administrivia: Is logoff feature necessary May 03 2006 12:53PM
Andrew van der Stock (vanderaj greebo net)
RE: Is logoff feature necessary May 03 2006 12:45PM
Keith Duffin (kduffin duffin org) (1 replies)
What about instances where an identity framework is used, such as CA's
Siteminder or IBM's Identity Mangament Suite? Closing the browser will
result in the session begin invalidated - I'm not sure if that cascades to
releasing other resources or not.

On Wed, 3 May 2006, Auri Rahimzadeh wrote:

> In addition, having the session state continues to reserves those resources
> on the server. So, if there were open recordsets in memory (bad developer!),
> login information, database connections, they all stay there. All closing
> the window does (and this assumes you have closed *all* browser windows, not
> just the one window that was being used), is tell the browser to destroy the
> cookie on the client. This is my no means secure, as has been pointed out by
> those questioning "what if the session key is in the querystring", which is
> generally frowned upon due to session hijacking attacks and replay attacks.
>
> The performance issue is very real. Imagine a server with 1000 users logging
> on in 20 minutes (probably an ASP scenario, and assuming the server is set
> up to time out sessions in 20 minutes, which is pretty standard). If each of
> them has 100K of session data (developers usually use it for convenience and
> for variable/data persistence), that's 100,000K (100 megs), used on the
> server. Now 10,000 users? 1 gig... Vertical and horizontal scaling gets
> expensive. In addition, the resources you normally need to release per
> session aren't released, so you could run out of available database pool
> connections, have open hooks on files, and so forth, and basically break
> your app. This only gets worse with servers with even longer session
> timeouts.
>
> I've never had a client *not* want a logoff button in their site specs,
> although they many times forget to ask for one since they're so used to it.
> I ask about putting one in and they usually say "of course!"
>
> Keep in mind that users many times may just close their windows instead of
> logging out. But many *will* logout, just to be safe/sure.
>
> Ahh, yes, another note: Session variables can be the bain of a developer's
> existence, just like cookies. If the wrong data is persisted, and the
> developer assumes a session key or cookie doesn't exist, and reads it
> without first making sure it's not from an old session or invalid data,
> things can get very, very messy (and darn hard to debug).
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Best,
>
> Auri Rahimzadeh
> Author
> Hacking the PSP
> www.hackingpsp.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rod Divilbiss [mailto:rod (at) rodsdot (dot) com [email concealed]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 8:40 AM
> To: test.future (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]
> Cc: webappsec (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
> Subject: RE: Is logoff feature necessary
>
> Closing the browser will cause the session to end. It will however takes
> some amount of time (usually 20 minutes) for the session to be terminated by
> the server. It may be possible for the user to reopen their browser before
> the session times out and reestablish the session. (Depends on how session
> state is maintained and how the web application is written.)
>
> Having a logoff button which explicitly kills the session is not a bad
> thing.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: test.future (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed] [mailto:test.future (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 2:41 AM
> To: webappsec (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
> Subject: Is logoff feature necessary
>
> We have a web applicaiton which do not have logoff button. The developer
> claims that it is unnecessary, since the session can be terminated by
> closing the browser. Is it correct? Thanks.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> Sponsored by: Watchfire
>
> The Twelve Most Common Application-level Hack Attacks Hackers continue to
> add billions to the cost of doing business online despite security
> executives' efforts to prevent malicious attacks. This whitepaper identifies
> the most common methods of attacks that we have seen, and outlines a
> guideline for developing secure web applications.
> Download this whitepaper today!
>
> https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/whitepapers.aspx?id=701300000007t9r

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> Sponsored by: Watchfire
>
> The Twelve Most Common Application-level Hack Attacks
> Hackers continue to add billions to the cost of doing business online
> despite security executives' efforts to prevent malicious attacks. This
> whitepaper identifies the most common methods of attacks that we have seen,
> and outlines a guideline for developing secure web applications.
> Download this whitepaper today!
>
> https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/whitepapers.aspx?id=701300000007t9r

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> Sponsored by: Watchfire
>
> The Twelve Most Common Application-level Hack Attacks
> Hackers continue to add billions to the cost of doing business online
> despite security executives' efforts to prevent malicious attacks. This
> whitepaper identifies the most common methods of attacks that we have seen,
> and outlines a guideline for developing secure web applications.
> Download this whitepaper today!
>
> https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/whitepapers.aspx?id=701300000007t9r

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Sponsored by: Watchfire

The Twelve Most Common Application-level Hack Attacks
Hackers continue to add billions to the cost of doing business online
despite security executives' efforts to prevent malicious attacks. This
whitepaper identifies the most common methods of attacks that we have seen,
and outlines a guideline for developing secure web applications.
Download this whitepaper today!

https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/whitepapers.aspx?id=701300000007t9r

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

[ reply ]
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 03 2006 01:30PM
Andrew van der Stock (vanderaj greebo net)
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 11:22AM
Michael Silk (michaelslists gmail com)
RE: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 09:56AM
Deepu Thomas Philip (deepu philip paladion net)
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 09:47AM
ViersOnline (viers free fr)
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 09:32AM
Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha (strange nsk no-ip org)
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 09:24AM
Peter Conrad (conrad tivano de)
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 09:22AM
Daniel Persson (mailto woden gmail com)
Re: Is logoff feature necessary May 02 2006 09:14AM
Vicente Aguilera (vaguilera isecauditors com)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus