|
Web Application Security
Unable to impersonate another user although having its cookie Jul 01 2009 10:14AM Juan Kinunt (kinunt gmail com) (4 replies) Re: Unable to impersonate another user although having its cookie Jul 03 2009 08:47PM Guillermo Caminer (flaco webappsec gmail com) (1 replies) Re: Unable to impersonate another user although having its cookie Jul 06 2009 06:22PM José Manuel Molina Pascual (raistlinmolina gmail com) RE: Unable to impersonate another user although having its cookie Jul 01 2009 04:26PM Hellman, Matthew (Hellman Matthew principal com) (1 replies) Re: Unable to impersonate another user although having its cookie Jul 02 2009 02:11PM Guillermo Caminer (flaco webappsec gmail com) Re: Unable to impersonate another user although having its cookie Jul 01 2009 02:30PM Irene Abezgauz (irene abezgauz gmail com) (1 replies) Re: Unable to impersonate another user although having its cookie Jul 01 2009 02:42PM Michael Yelland (myelland brotherhoodbank com) Re: Unable to impersonate another user although having its cookie Jul 01 2009 02:00PM pUm (hijacka googlemail com) (4 replies) Re: Unable to impersonate another user although having its cookie Jul 01 2009 03:02PM jay tomas infosecguru com (1 replies) Re: Unable to impersonate another user although having its cookie Jul 01 2009 03:29PM Christopher Firth (lists 100mb com au) Re: Unable to impersonate another user although having its cookie Jul 01 2009 02:50PM Marc Ouwerkerk (olderchurch gmail com) Re: Unable to impersonate another user although having its cookie Jul 01 2009 02:39PM S I (skander iversen gmail com) (1 replies) Re: Unable to impersonate another user although having its cookie Jul 01 2009 04:20PM Heine Deelstra (hdeelstra gmail com) (1 replies) Re: Unable to impersonate another user although having its cookie Jul 01 2009 02:20PM Brad Causey (bradcausey gmail com) |
|
|
Privacy Statement |
answer were there :)
When I have substituted the UserAgent I were able to impersonate the
user/hijack the session without problem!
Thanks to all!
[ reply ]