|
Web Application Security
At what layer to hash a password Jun 21 2010 01:06PM Robin Wood (robin digininja org) (5 replies) RE: At what layer to hash a password Jun 26 2010 07:26PM Dave Wichers (dave wichers aspectsecurity com) (1 replies) Re: At what layer to hash a password Jun 26 2010 05:02PM Javier Bassi (javierbassi gmail com) (1 replies) Re: At what layer to hash a password Jun 26 2010 11:13AM Tom Ritter (tom ritter vg) (1 replies) |
|
Privacy Statement |
On the client seems nice, but there are both advantages and disadvantages
+ you hash the password before it's even sent to the server, so the server never actually has the plaintext password
- you'll have to implement some challenge/response scheme, or the password can simply be replayed
- if you implement challenge/response, your client has to do something like this: hash(hash($password+$salt)+$challenge). This means that an attacker could authenticate with hash($password+$salt) instead of the password, which is the thing that is stored in your database (passing-the-hash attack) and the attacker won't have to crack the passwords to authenticate as a user if he breaks into the database
- some people use it as an SSL alternative but it's not a very good one (a skilled attacker in a MITM position just grabs the session cookie or changes the javascript on-the-fly to submit the plaintext password as well). It does offer some protection from passive sniffing though
- needs javascript to be enabled
In the application
+ it's easy and you can hash the password just after receiving it
- your application still receives the password in plaintext, it temporarily ends up in memory in lots of places (but an attacker will probably modify your app instead of going through RAM)
In the database
+ one system for all your applications (but if you want to change the algorithm you run into problems with existing passwords anyway)
- you have to do something like UPDATE users SET password = MYHASH('plaintextsecretpass'||salt) WHERE id=1 and your password will end up plaintext in your database logs.
I tend to do it in the application just after receiving the password. I really like the approach of native database accounts as well, but you'll have to store the plaintext password (or a connection handle if you can) in the user session.
No perfect solution I guess :) (especially if you have the multiple interfaces thing to take into account)
Niels
-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed] [mailto:listbounce (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]] On Behalf Of Robin Wood
Sent: maandag 21 juni 2010 15:06
To: webappsec (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
Subject: At what layer to hash a password
When developing a web app using a presentation (html generation not
browser side), application and database layer approach at what level
should you encode a password that is on its way into a database? I'm
generally thinking of hashing as the main encoding method but anything
could be used.
If you go for presentation layer then you could end up needing to
update multiple areas of the code if you change the encoding method
changes. You can pass this off to a function but in some situations
you could still end up having to make multiple updates. The advantage
of this layer is that the password is protected for its whole journey
down the stack and into the database so even if it leaks in a debug or
error log for example the plaintext isn't leaked. You could also have
a problem if you use multiple different presentation layers keeping
them all in sync and ensuring they all have the correct functionality
to perform the encoding.
At the other end if you do the encoding at the database layer then you
only have a single point to change to update the algorithm so this is
better from a coding point of view but there is the potential for the
password to leak out on its way there.
This leaves application layer, might be the best as you can pull all
the setting calls into a single place but there is still chance of
some leakage.
I prefer the presentation layer from a security point of view but from
clean coding I'd rather do it at database layer the same way I encode
timestamps to what will go into the database at the last minute.
What do other people think?
Robin
This list is sponsored by Cenzic
--------------------------------------
Let Us Hack You. Before Hackers Do!
It's Finally Here - The Cenzic Website HealthCheck. FREE.
Request Yours Now!
http://www.cenzic.com/2009HClaunch_Securityfocus
--------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by Cenzic
--------------------------------------
Let Us Hack You. Before Hackers Do!
It's Finally Here - The Cenzic Website HealthCheck. FREE.
Request Yours Now!
http://www.cenzic.com/2009HClaunch_Securityfocus
--------------------------------------
[ reply ]