|
LogAnalysis
[logs] syslog config file format poll Sep 06 2007 03:42PM Rainer Gerhards (rgerhards hq adiscon com) (2 replies) Re: [logs] syslog config file format poll Sep 07 2007 07:00PM Andreux Fort ($B$"$s$I$j$e!<(B) (afort choqolat org) (1 replies) Re: [logs] syslog config file format poll Sep 06 2007 06:31PM Marcin Antkiewicz (loganalysis kajtek org) (1 replies) Re: [logs] syslog config file format poll Sep 06 2007 09:13PM Marcus J. Ranum (mjr ranum com) (2 replies) |
|
Privacy Statement |
> Marcin Antkiewicz wrote:
> >>I also like XML, because I work with XML-lovers who know how to parse
>
> Minor nit: use of XML is actually prima facie evidence that you DON'T
> know how to parse.
Heh.
I vote against XML. Or at least for XML to not be the only way to
config; you can always allow for multiple config mechanisms, and
accept whichever is present, and/or merge multiple config methods if
present.
syslog-ng has a perfectly good config format. Might as well use
something similar to that.
So, what does rsyslog do that syslog-ng doesn't?
- Morty
_______________________________________________
LogAnalysis mailing list
LogAnalysis (at) loganalysis (dot) org [email concealed]
http://www.loganalysis.org/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
[ reply ]