SecurityFocus

Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 13 2007 10:51PM
Marcus J. Ranum (mjr ranum com) (1 replies)

Anton Chuvakin wrote:
>Anybody care to restart the discussion and see what the collective
>wisdom of loganalysis can produce?

I am coding on something regarding regexless parsing as we
speak. ETA is unknown but certainly before Xmas. It will be
open source but not GPL.

mjr.
_______________________________________________
LogAnalysis mailing list
LogAnalysis (at) loganalysis (dot) org [email concealed]
http://www.loganalysis.org/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis

[ reply ]

Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 14 2007 12:12AM
E G (bronc94583 yahoo com) (1 replies)

Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 14 2007 07:30PM
Christina Noren (cfrln cfrln com) (1 replies)

Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 14 2007 08:05PM
E G (bronc94583 yahoo com) (1 replies)

RE: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 14 2007 09:41PM
Kinsley, Michael (michael kinsley sensage com) (1 replies)

Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 14 2007 10:40PM
Christina Noren (cfrln cfrln com) (1 replies)

Re: Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 15 2007 12:07AM
Michael Kinsley (michael kinsley sensage com) (3 replies)

Re: Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 15 2007 05:59AM
Tom Le (dottom gmail com)

Re: Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 15 2007 05:33AM
E G (bronc94583 yahoo com)

Re: Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 15 2007 02:25AM
cfrln cfrln com