SecurityFocus

[logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 13 2007 06:56PM
Anton Chuvakin (anton chuvakin org) (3 replies)

Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 17 2007 07:30PM
Daniel Cid (danielcid yahoo com br) (3 replies)

Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 18 2007 10:27PM
Jason Haar (Jason Haar trimble co nz) (1 replies)

Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 19 2007 01:01AM
Daniel Cid (dcid ossec net)

Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 17 2007 09:44PM
Tom Le (dottom gmail com)

Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 17 2007 09:38PM
Tom Le (dottom gmail com)

Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 14 2007 01:28AM
Raffael Marty (rmarty splunk com) (1 replies)

Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 14 2007 04:11PM
Marcus J. Ranum (mjr ranum com)

RE: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 14 2007 01:13AM
Desai, Ashish (Ashish Desai fmr com)

Or someday MJR finally learns Perl or Ruby and tells us
he has seen the light and says that a log processing DSL's implement in
Ruby/Perl
is going to save the world ;-)

Ashish
Logmaster at some company

-----Original Message-----
From: loganalysis-bounces (at) loganalysis (dot) org [email concealed]
[mailto:loganalysis-bounces (at) loganalysis (dot) org [email concealed]] On Behalf Of Anton Chuvakin
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 2:57 PM
To: loganalysis (at) loganalysis (dot) org [email concealed]
Subject: [logs] regexless parsing, again?

....
- wait until all logs are in a common XML schema (we know how this one
ends: MJR emerges out of the darkest part of the woods and kicks
everybody's ass :-))
.....

_______________________________________________
LogAnalysis mailing list
LogAnalysis (at) loganalysis (dot) org [email concealed]
http://www.loganalysis.org/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis

[ reply ]