LogAnalysis
Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 13 2007 10:55PM
Marcus J. Ranum (mjr ranum com) (1 replies)
Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 14 2007 09:18AM
Mordechai T. Abzug (morty frakir org) (1 replies)
Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 14 2007 04:45PM
Marcus J. Ranum (mjr ranum com) (2 replies)
Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 14 2007 07:59PM
David Corlette (dcorlette novell com) (1 replies)
Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 14 2007 08:08PM
Marcus J. Ranum (mjr ranum com)
David Corlette wrote:
>I guess what I'm saying though is that I'm not sure I'd ditch regexes or other parsers in favor of a single other parser - why not let the author pick the parser that's most appropriate for the message format?

Nobody's going to force anyone to do anything. I'm just trying to solve
my own problem. If you like regexes you can use them to your heart's
content for as long as you like.

None of the work I engage in is "standards track" or anything like that,
either. It's all just take it or leave it. (cue Sinatra "My Way" and exit)

mjr.
_______________________________________________
LogAnalysis mailing list
LogAnalysis (at) loganalysis (dot) org [email concealed]
http://www.loganalysis.org/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis

[ reply ]
Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 14 2007 07:14PM
Mordechai T. Abzug (morty frakir org)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus