|
LogAnalysis
Re: Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 18 2007 04:51PM Marcus J. Ranum (mjr ranum com) (2 replies) Re: Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 19 2007 04:58PM E G (bronc94583 yahoo com) (4 replies) RE: Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 19 2007 06:40PM Tina Bird (tbird precision-guesswork com) |
|
Privacy Statement |
> >> There have been some amazing advances in hardware to do PCRE.
> That'd the the "hardware turbo-charged lipstick on a pig" option.
Even parsing is lipstick on a pig. The correct solution is to
redesign all log systems so log events are structured, and come with
machine-readable catalogs, a la SNMP trap. [Yes, SNMP sucks in
general, but the SNMP community dodged most log analysis problems 10+
years ago, such that SNMP analysis solutions have been ahead of syslog
analysis solutions for many years, IME.]
Too bad unstructured syslog isn't going to go away any time soon. Any
attempt to analyze unstructured data is "lipstick on a pig" compared
to importing vendor log catalogs in a machine-readable, vendor-neutral
format (such as *spit* ASN.1 *spit*). Whether you use regexes,
parsing, hybrid multi-layer techniques, or a rigidly structured format
with event catalogs, it's all a trade-off between log analysis system
design complexity, log analysis system performance, log analysis user
burden, log compatibility with "legacy" log systems, and comfort of
the developers generating the logs.
[Cue a bunch of starry-eyed innocents talking up CEE, CEF, and other
"standards" that are supposed to make unstructured logs go away Real
Soon Now.]
- Morty
_______________________________________________
LogAnalysis mailing list
LogAnalysis (at) loganalysis (dot) org [email concealed]
http://www.loganalysis.org/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
[ reply ]