|
|
LogAnalysis
Re: Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 18 2007 04:51PM Marcus J. Ranum (mjr ranum com) (2 replies) Re: Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 20 2007 12:59AM Mordechai T. Abzug (morty frakir org) (2 replies) Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 20 2007 02:07PM Mike Heisler (mgh4 cornell edu) (2 replies) RE: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 20 2007 07:31PM Rainer Gerhards (rgerhards hq adiscon com) (1 replies) Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 24 2007 10:30PM Anton Chuvakin (anton chuvakin org) (3 replies) RE: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 27 2007 04:41PM Eric Fitzgerald (Eric Fitzgerald microsoft com) (1 replies) RE: Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 20 2007 06:48AM Rainer Gerhards (rgerhards hq adiscon com) Re: Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 19 2007 04:58PM E G (bronc94583 yahoo com) (4 replies) RE: Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again? Sep 19 2007 06:40PM Tina Bird (tbird precision-guesswork com) |
|
Privacy Statement |
have come to thoroughly enjoy the conversations and have learned a lot.
Marcus is like a well aged single malt scotch. He is an acquired taste,
yet once your palate has developed enough you will appreciate the
subtleties and nuances that makes his reputation well deserved. You can
certainly count on mjr to look at an issue from a perspective most have
not. Is he caustic at times? Hell yeah. But that is part of his charm.
Maybe we should take up a collection and print him up some business
cards that officially bestow the title of Global Curmudgeon on him. :-)
Brian
-----Original Message-----
From: loganalysis-bounces (at) loganalysis (dot) org [email concealed]
[mailto:loganalysis-bounces (at) loganalysis (dot) org [email concealed]] On Behalf Of E G
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 12:58 PM
To: Marcus J. Ranum; Andrew Hay; Desai, Ashish
Cc: loganalysis (at) loganalysis (dot) org [email concealed]
Subject: Re: Re: [logs] regexless parsing, again?
Being a nobody in this sector, I personally like getting different
points of views and hearing about these new methods and ideas for doing
things.
A post like this really just mute the conversation.
These "I know better then you" posts have basically killed this
interesting thread without adding anything to it...
Isn't this list moderated?
- Erik "the nobody"
--- "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr (at) ranum (dot) com [email concealed]> wrote:
>
> >> There have been some amazing advances in hardware
> to do PCRE.
>
>
> That'd the the "hardware turbo-charged lipstick on a pig" option.
>
> mjr.
> _______________________________________________
> LogAnalysis mailing list
> LogAnalysis (at) loganalysis (dot) org [email concealed]
>
http://www.loganalysis.org/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
>
________________________________________________________________________
____________
Check out the hottest 2008 models today at Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html
_______________________________________________
LogAnalysis mailing list
LogAnalysis (at) loganalysis (dot) org [email concealed]
http://www.loganalysis.org/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
_______________________________________________
LogAnalysis mailing list
LogAnalysis (at) loganalysis (dot) org [email concealed]
http://www.loganalysis.org/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
[ reply ]