LogAnalysis
RE: [logs] Star Trek and Log Integrity May 06 2008 09:07PM
Marcus J. Ranum (mjr ranum com) (1 replies)
Re: [logs] Star Trek and Log Integrity May 06 2008 10:05PM
Bill Burge (bill burge com)

But they're lightyears ahead of their main competition!

They store everything on ROM-u-lan... ;-)

Bill Burge
bill (at) burge (dot) com [email concealed]

On May 6, 2008, at 2:07 PM, Marcus J. Ranum wrote:

> chris.wee (at) loglogic (dot) com [email concealed] wrote:
>> It is so disappointing that even in the 24th century, computer logs
>> are
>> not tamper-proof.
>
> What do you expect from a starship that runs on Windows-24k? Microsoft
> added support for syslog in 2348 - citing customer demand - but still
> has no Enterprise-class log architecture.
>
> mjr.
> --
> PS: :)
> _______________________________________________
> LogAnalysis mailing list
> LogAnalysis (at) loganalysis (dot) org [email concealed]
> http://www.loganalysis.org/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
_______________________________________________
LogAnalysis mailing list
LogAnalysis (at) loganalysis (dot) org [email concealed]
http://www.loganalysis.org/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis

[ reply ]


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus