Back to list
RE: honeywall/pot on same host
Sep 27 2006 02:14PM
William Woodhams (William Woodhams wegmans com)
I personally prefer having it on two different systems. Reason being I
can monitor both of them separately and if I need to I can restart my
honeywall without having to affect my honeypot itself. Also it allows
me to report on if the honeywall was breached only or if someone
actually got into the honeypot.
Development Group-Technical Systems
William.Woodhams (at) wegmans (dot) com [email concealed]
Newcastle United signs Michael Owen...Enough Said!
From: listbounce (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed] [mailto:listbounce (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]]
On Behalf Of Mike Gilligan
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 3:07 AM
To: honeypots (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
Subject: honeywall/pot on same host
Could anyone weight in on or point me to a resource which confirms
single host can be used for the honeywall and honeypot systems or if it
recommended to have separate physical machines for each and why.
Get cheap fares online with MSN Travel http://www.msn.com.sg/travel/
[ reply ]
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus