Likely nothing today, most malware isn't smart enough to figure that out.
On Mar 3, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Jason Lewis wrote:
> Slightly related, I was wondering what might happen if I made every
> query to the honeypot resolve back to the honeypot?
>
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Brent Huston <lbhlists (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]> wrote:
>> One of the tactics our clients use is that they stand up one of our HoneyPoint Agents on a decoy box and then send all malicious and failed queries to that IP address. The HoneyPoint Agent then absorbs the traffic for analysis.
>>
>> You can find a little bit about it from one of our customers here, they wrote it up with us: http://hurl.ws/cbhp
>>
>> Let me know if that helps!
>>
>> On Mar 2, 2010, at 4:00 PM, Jason Lewis wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone have any pointers to dns honeypots or maybe just BIND
>>> configurations that would allow logging of malicious queries without
>>> actually executing them?
>>
>>
On Mar 3, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Jason Lewis wrote:
> Slightly related, I was wondering what might happen if I made every
> query to the honeypot resolve back to the honeypot?
>
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Brent Huston <lbhlists (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]> wrote:
>> One of the tactics our clients use is that they stand up one of our HoneyPoint Agents on a decoy box and then send all malicious and failed queries to that IP address. The HoneyPoint Agent then absorbs the traffic for analysis.
>>
>> You can find a little bit about it from one of our customers here, they wrote it up with us: http://hurl.ws/cbhp
>>
>> Let me know if that helps!
>>
>> On Mar 2, 2010, at 4:00 PM, Jason Lewis wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone have any pointers to dns honeypots or maybe just BIND
>>> configurations that would allow logging of malicious queries without
>>> actually executing them?
>>
>>
[ reply ]