Firewalls
PIX to PIX Certificate VPN question Jun 09 2006 02:12PM
Conlan Adams (conlan midwesteyebanks org) (2 replies)
RE: PIX to PIX Certificate VPN question Jun 09 2006 05:32PM
Brandon Harris (brandon harris comcast net)
Re: PIX to PIX Certificate VPN question Jun 09 2006 05:01PM
Aaron Rohyans (aaronr imcu com) (1 replies)
RE: PIX to PIX Certificate VPN question Jun 09 2006 08:03PM
Conlan Adams (conlan midwesteyebanks org) (1 replies)
What you put works great when using PSK as the authentication for your VPN, and it works with the software clients assuming the OU they belong to is called "mygroup". But when you run that config with a PIX 501, it doesn't pickup the split tunnel. That's basically what I have on the head end, but the ACLs for the split tunnel don't get pushed.

I attempted to do a ca subject-name <ca_nickname> OU=<my_ou_here> without luck, attempting to set the OU to the same as the vpngroup name

Conlan Adams

________________________________

From: Aaron Rohyans [mailto:aaronr (at) imcu (dot) com [email concealed]]
Sent: Fri 6/9/2006 1:01 PM
To: Conlan Adams; firewalls (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
Subject: Re: PIX to PIX Certificate VPN question

I may be misunderstanding you, but why do you have to use names within your certs to activate your split tunnel? Why can't you define the group and create a split tunnel ACL within it on both ends to serve as the basis for split-tunneling?

access-list nonat permit ip <local ip><local sub> <remote ip><remote sub>

isakmp policy 5 authentication rsa
isakmp policy 5 encryption 3des
isakmp policy 5 hash sha
isakmp policy 5 group 2
isakmp policy 5 lifetime 86400

vpngroup mygroup address-pool myaddresspool
vpngroup mygroup dns-server X.X.X.X
vpngroup mygroup wins-server X.X.X.X
vpngroup mygroup split-tunnel nonat
vpngroup mygroup idle-time 1800
vpngroup mygroup password ********

Or are you using an EasyVPN client/server setup?

Aaron

----- Original Message -----
From: Conlan Adams <mailto:conlan (at) midwesteyebanks (dot) org [email concealed]>
To: firewalls (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 10:12 AM
Subject: PIX to PIX Certificate VPN question

Stupid question that I am having a heck of a time finding an answer for when I search the web.

I have a remote access setup, where I have a PIX 515E inhouse, and several 501s outhouse. All of them have validated certs, but I am having issues with my split-tunnel implementation.

After much digging, I seem to have found that the split tunnel isn't propagating the ACLs because the vpngroup isn't being set properly on the 501s. They are connecting, and authenticating properly, and all traffic is sent over, but since the split-tunnel has to be assigned by name, its not carrying over.

The PIXs are connecting fine, and passing traffic, just not running the split-tunnel.

Any thoughts on how I set the vpngroup on the 501s? I attempted to set an OU with the ca subject-name command, but doesn't seem to help.

Thanks in advance

Conlan Adams

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________

[ reply ]
Re: PIX to PIX Certificate VPN question Jun 09 2006 08:34PM
Aaron Rohyans (aaronr imcu com) (1 replies)
RE: PIX to PIX Certificate VPN question Jun 09 2006 09:51PM
Conlan Adams (conlan midwesteyebanks org)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus