Phishing & BotNets
valid problem Nov 09 2005 06:59AM
Lance James (lancej securescience net) (2 replies)
Re: valid problem Nov 09 2005 10:43PM
Nick Bilogorskiy (nbilogorskiy fortinet com)
Re: valid problem Nov 09 2005 10:35PM
Saeed Abu Nimeh (drellman hotmail com) (1 replies)
Re: valid problem Nov 09 2005 10:59PM
Lance James (lancej securescience net) (1 replies)
Saeed Abu Nimeh wrote:

> The argument would be similar to all other security public available
> lists. As well they are available to hackers, however, they are
> beneficiary.
> Saeed Abu-Nimeh

Umm, that argument works for security - but when phishers are monitoring
activity for ROI, it's a different issue.

They will see "who's tracking them, who's checking them out, and will
perfect their technique". In security, it's a display of exploits that
may cause trouble, - I think this can not be compared.

>
> Lance James wrote:
>
>> I think there is a valid problem with a "phishing (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]"
>> list.
>>
>> It's publicly available to everyone - including phishers. Why the hell
>> would anyone post on it?
>>
>
>

--
Best Regards,
Lance James
Secure Science Corporation
www.securescience.net
Author of 'Phishing Exposed'
http://www.securescience.net/amazon/
Find out how malware is affecting your company: Get a DIA account today!
https://slam.securescience.com/signup.cgi - it's free!

[ reply ]
Re: valid problem Nov 09 2005 11:43PM
Byron L. Sonne (blsonne rogers com)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus