|
Phishing & BotNets
Anti-phishing Toolbars Evaluation Jul 24 2006 09:08AM Abhishek Kumar (abhishek kumar paladion net) (2 replies) Re: Anti-phishing Toolbars Evaluation Jul 27 2006 10:42AM xun dong (xundong cs york ac uk) (3 replies) RE: Anti-phishing Toolbars Evaluation Jul 28 2006 12:30PM Abhishek Kumar (abhishek kumar paladion net) (1 replies) Re: Anti-phishing Toolbars Evaluation Jul 27 2006 07:22PM Saeed Abu Nimeh (drellman hotmail com) (1 replies) |
|
Privacy Statement |
profile of the toolbars I'd highly recommend increasing your phish sampling
size.
You can always use our confirmed/terminated lists:
http://www.castlecops.com/modules.php?name=Fried_Phish&fp=phish
http://www.castlecops.com/modules.php?name=Fried_Phish&fp=phish&which=6
You may also want to check out some other toolbars like that from Firetrust
and Compete or Google Firefox Toolbar:
http://toolbar.google.com/firefox/
http://www.firetrust.com/firetrustsitehound.html
http://home.compete.com/
Some of these pull the same sources.
Paul Laudanski, Microsoft MVP Windows-Security
Phish XML Feed: http://www.castlecops.com/article6619.html
Phish Takedown: http://castlecops.com/pirt
www.CastleCops.com | de.CastleCops.com | wiki.CastleCops.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Abhishek Kumar" <abhishek.kumar (at) paladion (dot) net [email concealed]>
To: <phishing (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]>
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 5:08 AM
Subject: Anti-phishing Toolbars Evaluation
> Hi All,
>
> Recently I carried out an evaluation of some of the popular Anti-phishing
> toolbars. The toolbars were tested on a number of parameters such as,
> accuracy in detecting phishing URLs, alerting mechanism, detailed analysis
> of websites, help information provided to users etc. The results obtained
> from the evaluation can help the users in selecting the right
> anti-phishing
> toolbar.
>
> You can read the details of the evaluation on my blog on phishing at
> http://phishtrails.blogspot.com/. All flowers, brickbats and suggestions
> are
> welcome.
>
> Thanks
> Abhishek
>
[ reply ]