Le lundi 07 mai 2007 à 10:44 -0400, Joshua Wright a écrit :
> While I haven't seen this technology in action yet, I have a pretty
> good idea how it works, and I think it's a mistake to trust said
> technology or common variants for the protection of sensitive networks.
Idea of adding dummy traffic to legit WEP traffic has been mentioned
here before. A quick answer to this could be:
1. spot real MAC addresses
2. PCAP filter your capture
I don't think they want to overload real clients and AP with dummy WEP
traffic...
--
http://sid.rstack.org/
PGP KeyID: 157E98EE FingerPrint: FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE
SyScan'07: 2 days of WiFi training and practice in Singapore
http://syscan.org/reg_training.html
> While I haven't seen this technology in action yet, I have a pretty
> good idea how it works, and I think it's a mistake to trust said
> technology or common variants for the protection of sensitive networks.
Idea of adding dummy traffic to legit WEP traffic has been mentioned
here before. A quick answer to this could be:
1. spot real MAC addresses
2. PCAP filter your capture
I don't think they want to overload real clients and AP with dummy WEP
traffic...
--
http://sid.rstack.org/
PGP KeyID: 157E98EE FingerPrint: FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE
SyScan'07: 2 days of WiFi training and practice in Singapore
http://syscan.org/reg_training.html
[ reply ]