Wireless Security
RE: Perpetuating weak wireless security May 08 2007 08:24PM
Nico Darrow (ndarrow airdefense net) (2 replies)
Re: Perpetuating weak wireless security May 10 2007 01:41AM
4ChecK (4check inbox com)
Re: Perpetuating weak wireless security May 09 2007 07:31PM
nick leachman (nleachman gmail com) (2 replies)
Re: Perpetuating weak wireless security May 10 2007 01:08AM
Jex (hewhohuntscats gmail com)
On 5/9/07, nick leachman <nleachman (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]> wrote:
> Hi Nico,
>
> First, it was nice to meet you last week at AD. I've heard much about
> you from Jerry - all good no less!
>
---
>
> 2) What bothers me more is that solutions of this type provides a
> means to extend the life of a known weak security method. Argue what
> you will about bridging the gap to allow companies to make it to their
> next hardware refresh cycle (in order to discard WEP); but we know
> that what will actually happen in many cases is that this type of
> solution will instead provide a means to delay the normal refresh
> cycle - thereby extending the life of WEP in this case. If it is
> "perceived" that the king now has clothes, where's the incentive to
> change? (And no, I'm not a hardware vendor :-)
>

People are still using WEP. I would argue that while a move to WPA is
a Good Thing, we can't people froce to do so, for various reasons. I'm
sure someone somewhere will appreciate this strengthening of WEP, and
the technology can possibly very well be used to boost WPA/WPA2/etc.

-HeWhoHuntsCats, SysAdmin in training.

[ reply ]
RE: Perpetuating weak wireless security May 09 2007 09:44PM
Nico Darrow (ndarrow airdefense net)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus