Wireless Security
assuming encryption levels Jun 28 2009 09:38AM
Robin Wood (dninja gmail com) (2 replies)
Re: assuming encryption levels Jun 29 2009 02:04AM
Mike Kershaw (dragorn kismetwireless net)
Re: assuming encryption levels Jun 28 2009 04:34PM
Cedric Blancher (blancher cartel-securite fr) (1 replies)
Re: assuming encryption levels Jun 28 2009 07:54PM
Robin Wood (dninja gmail com) (1 replies)
2009/6/28 Cedric Blancher <blancher (at) cartel-securite (dot) fr [email concealed]>:
> Le dimanche 28 juin 2009 à 10:38 +0100, Robin Wood a écrit :
>>     <encryption>WPA</encryption>
>>     <encryption>PSK</encryption>
>
> WPA and PSK are not encryption algorithms.

I'll let you argue semantics with Dragorn as that came directly from
the kismet networks XML file.

My question still stands, what is in place here:

<encryption>WEP</encryption>
<encryption>TKIP</encryption>
<encryption>WPA</encryption>
<encryption>PSK</encryption>
<encryption>AES-CCM</encryption>

If I remember my 617 class correctly WPA uses WEP (or at least the
same algorithm) for encryption but WPA2 uses AES so which is this
network using?

Robin

[ reply ]
Re: assuming encryption levels Jun 28 2009 08:22PM
Cedric Blancher (blancher cartel-securite fr)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus