Has anyone considered the power of .25 sq ft of aluminum foil, folded
into a small cone, or something similar? It would hold your iPhone,
and provide good directionality.

Kurt

On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 08:25, audionyx <audionyx (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]> wrote:
> Has anyone considered that, when a phone is in the hand of its user, it's unlikely to be uniformly omnidirectional and, instead, may have a pattern with lobes? If this were the case, one direction will probably be most sensitive. Once that pattern is established, then I would suspect it wouldn't be too difficult to plot signal strength against it. Of course, influences of the building's structure (pillars, walls, cube frames, coke machines) would impact the placement of perceived radio sources.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Geoff Armstrong" <geoffarm (at) exchange.ubc (dot) ca [email concealed]>
> To: "Robin Wood" <dninja (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]>, "Mike Kershaw" <dragorn (at) kismetwireless (dot) net [email concealed]>
> Cc: wifisec (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
> Sent: Friday, October 9, 2009 8:55:29 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Subject: RE: WiFiFoFum radar
>
> I tested wififofum radar in a building with 40 AP's.. It was totally
> off. It's a guess at best.
>
> The scanning feature is nice though.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: listbounce (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed] [mailto:listbounce (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]]
> On Behalf Of Robin Wood
> Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 1:59 PM
> To: Mike Kershaw
> Cc: wifisec (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
> Subject: Re: WiFiFoFum radar
>
>
> My theory was along the lines of your second but I was stuck on how if
> you turned it on in a location it knew where to place them for the
> first position. We didn't test that so it may just randomly distribute
> them round the map and work it out once you start moving. As it has a
> compass built in it knows which way you are walking and if it is
> getting weaker the signal will probably be behind you.
>
> Robin
>

[ reply ]