|
Focus on Apple
Re: Hijacking a Macbook in 60 Seconds or Less Aug 10 2006 11:50AM Radoslav Dejanoviæ (radoslav dejanovic opsus hr) (1 replies) Re: Hijacking a Macbook in 60 Seconds or Less Aug 10 2006 03:11PM Howard Oakley (h oakley btconnect com) (4 replies) Re: Hijacking a Macbook in 60 Seconds or Less Aug 11 2006 12:23PM Radoslav Dejanoviæ (radoslav dejanovic opsus hr) (1 replies) Re: Hijacking a Macbook in 60 Seconds or Less Aug 11 2006 03:22PM Roy Atkinson (roy atkinson jax org) (2 replies) Re: Hijacking a Macbook in 60 Seconds or Less Aug 11 2006 06:51PM Chris Pepper (pepper reppep com) (1 replies) RE: Hijacking a Macbook in 60 Seconds or Less Aug 11 2006 08:10PM Todd Woodward (todd_woodward symantec com) (1 replies) Re: Hijacking a Macbook in 60 Seconds or Less Aug 11 2006 09:31PM Sam Pierson (samuel pierson gmail com) (2 replies) Re: Hijacking a Macbook in 60 Seconds or Less Aug 11 2006 10:05PM Howard Oakley (h oakley btconnect com) RE: Hijacking a Macbook in 60 Seconds or Less Aug 11 2006 09:50PM Todd Woodward (todd_woodward symantec com) (1 replies) Re: Hijacking a Macbook in 60 Seconds or Less Aug 12 2006 09:12PM Bill Weiss houdini+focus-apple (at) clanspum (dot) net [email concealed] (houdini+focus-apple clanspum net) (1 replies) Re: Hijacking a Macbook in 60 Seconds or Less Aug 11 2006 05:36PM Sam Pierson (samuel pierson gmail com) Re: Hijacking a Macbook in 60 Seconds or Less Aug 10 2006 05:38PM Michael Edwards (medwards digital-legal com) (1 replies) How to persuade someone to switch off wireless Aug 11 2006 12:11PM Radoslav Dejanoviæ (radoslav dejanovic opsus hr) Re: Hijacking a Macbook in 60 Seconds or Less Aug 10 2006 04:42PM mfossi securityfocus com (1 replies) Re: Hijacking a Macbook in 60 Seconds or Less Aug 10 2006 05:55PM Howard Oakley (h oakley btconnect com) |
|
|
Privacy Statement |
Any comment on the above article. I am not expert on IEEE 802.11
standard requirements but it seems - at first look - a first possible
debunk.
I am very sorry I can't find the link where I read it, but apparently
Ellch and Maynor refused to show the hack with a third party MacBook
in controlled environment - whatever that means - raising the
suspicion they need to have physical access to the machine before hand.
Cheers
M
[ reply ]