Focus on Apple
OS X Adware, But Is It Real? Nov 25 2006 02:50PM
Sûnnet Beskerming (info beskerming com) (5 replies)
First reported by the Finnish Information Security company, F-Secure
(http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/
archive-112006.html#00001030), a new proof-of-concept piece of
malware that specifically targets OS X has been identified. Dubbed
IAdware, the PoC is designed to open the browser every time that an
application is opened (as a demonstration that more can be done).

Although the exact mechanism was not disclosed, the coverage suggests
that exploitation will be limited to only the applications that the
user has run access to (which should be relatively limited in a non-
privileged account) and infection does not appear to actually modify
the parent application bundle. The claim that it requires copy
permissions to a System Library (~/Library, /Library, /usr/lib, or /
System is not specified) rules out certain Mach-O header modification
techniques, as well as preventing lesser privileged users from being
infected due to a basic lack of write access to many sensitive
directories.

Based on the available technical documentation from Apple regarding
dynamically loading code at application runtime, and in conjunction
with the limited information released by F-Secure, the most likely
targeted directory is '/usr/lib'. This would make the malware a
dynamic library infector (libSystem.B.dylib would provide the most
consistent activation vector) - sort of equivalent to a malicious
win32.dll on Windows. Luckily for most users, a default system
installation will prevent non-admin users from writing to that
directory (and other critical system library directories). The other
options for dynamic loading of code at runtime are not as likely to
result in consistent exploitation across arbitrary applications, or
are based on binary modification of key system applications
(considered extremely unlikely based on the limited screen capture F-
Secure provides).

It is also not known whether it is related to Macarena (Symantec) or
MachoMan (Independent release), which are two recent OS X malware
samples. It is, however, considered unlikely to be related to these
releases.

In summary, the key deviation from normal system operation that this
malware seems to require is write access to an unnamed System Library
(F-Secure's claim of need for admin rights to exploit is counter-
intuitive at this point). So long as users refrain from running
rampant in their admin accounts, this malware should pose little
threat, even if it does get into the wild.

Dissenting opinions and constructive criticism are welcome.

Sincerely,

Carl Jongsma
info (at) beskerming (dot) com [email concealed]
Sûnnet Beskerming Pty. Ltd.
Adelaide, Australia
http://www.beskerming.com
Tel: 0410 707 444 / 08 8283 1154

Sûnnet Beskerming Pty. Ltd.

Established in mid 2004, Sûnnet Beskerming Pty. Ltd. is the sister
company to Jongsma & Jongsma Pty. Ltd., and was formed to develop and
commercialise advanced Information Security research. Sûnnet
Beskerming Pty. Ltd. is an Information Security specialist and, in
conjunction with the tools developed in house, provides total
security solutions and services, from the perimeter to internal data
stores, including web application security and security testing and
analysis.

[ reply ]
Re: OS X Adware, But Is It Real? Nov 28 2006 04:37AM
Sûnnet Beskerming (info beskerming com)
Re: OS X Adware, But Is It Real? Nov 27 2006 04:05PM
Derek Chesterfield (dez mac com) (1 replies)
Re: OS X Adware, But Is It Real? Nov 27 2006 08:55PM
Philippe Devallois (phdevallois intego com)
Re: OS X Adware, But Is It Real? Nov 27 2006 03:16PM
K F \(lists\) (kf_lists digitalmunition com)
Re: OS X Adware, But Is It Real? Nov 27 2006 03:09PM
Magnus Bergman (magnus trisec net)
Re: OS X Adware, But Is It Real? Nov 27 2006 12:58PM
Aaron Adams (aadams securityfocus com)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus