Focus on Apple
OS X Adware, But Is It Real? Nov 25 2006 02:50PM
Sūnnet Beskerming (info beskerming com) (5 replies)
Re: OS X Adware, But Is It Real? Nov 28 2006 04:37AM
Sûnnet Beskerming (info beskerming com)
Re: OS X Adware, But Is It Real? Nov 27 2006 04:05PM
Derek Chesterfield (dez mac com) (1 replies)
Re: OS X Adware, But Is It Real? Nov 27 2006 08:55PM
Philippe Devallois (phdevallois intego com)
Re: OS X Adware, But Is It Real? Nov 27 2006 03:16PM
K F \(lists\) (kf_lists digitalmunition com)
Re: OS X Adware, But Is It Real? Nov 27 2006 03:09PM
Magnus Bergman (magnus trisec net)
On Nov 25, 2006, at 15:50 , Sûnnet Beskerming wrote:

> Based on the available technical documentation from Apple regarding
> dynamically loading code at application runtime, and in conjunction
> with the limited information released by F-Secure, the most likely
> targeted directory is '/usr/lib'. This would make the malware a
> dynamic library infector (libSystem.B.dylib would provide the most
> consistent activation vector) - sort of equivalent to a malicious
> win32.dll on Windows. Luckily for most users, a default system
> installation will prevent non-admin users from writing to that
> directory (and other critical system library directories). The
> other options for dynamic loading of code at runtime are not as
> likely to result in consistent exploitation across arbitrary
> applications, or are based on binary modification of key system
> applications (considered extremely unlikely based on the limited
> screen capture F-Secure provides).

What about for example DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES or some other of the
DYLD_ environment variables?

They are documented in dyld(1).

//Magnus

[ reply ]
Re: OS X Adware, But Is It Real? Nov 27 2006 12:58PM
Aaron Adams (aadams securityfocus com)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus