Focus on Apple
OS X Adware, But Is It Real? Nov 25 2006 02:50PM
Sūnnet Beskerming (info beskerming com) (5 replies)
Re: OS X Adware, But Is It Real? Nov 28 2006 04:37AM
Sûnnet Beskerming (info beskerming com)
Re: OS X Adware, But Is It Real? Nov 27 2006 04:05PM
Derek Chesterfield (dez mac com) (1 replies)
Re: OS X Adware, But Is It Real? Nov 27 2006 08:55PM
Philippe Devallois (phdevallois intego com)
Re: OS X Adware, But Is It Real? Nov 27 2006 03:16PM
K F \(lists\) (kf_lists digitalmunition com)
Re: OS X Adware, But Is It Real? Nov 27 2006 03:09PM
Magnus Bergman (magnus trisec net)
Re: OS X Adware, But Is It Real? Nov 27 2006 12:58PM
Aaron Adams (aadams securityfocus com)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> It is also not known whether it is related to Macarena (Symantec) or
> MachoMan (Independent release), which are two recent OS X malware
> samples. It is, however, considered unlikely to be related to these
> releases.
>

For the record Macarena and MachoMan are the same file infecter. roy g
biv wrote it and named it MachoMan. Most AV vendors have a policy that
they won't name the malware the same as what the actual authors do, so
someone at Symantec was being clever and named it after another catchy song.

Aaron

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFauDY3FCu6/q5pn0RAhqLAJ9wJ/BIpCsKH+v2+r6xWej3YPYQ0gCeIrOB
XFHv8qN3sbcMK4WwAgB+Kk4=
=/Ppv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ reply ]


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus