2006/11/29, veto (at) forked (dot) dk [email concealed] <veto (at) forked (dot) dk [email concealed]>:
> Funny how Apple decided to go patch the 1 year old Perl_sv_vcatpvfn bug
> now, after Kevin pointed it out on the list the other day.
>
> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15629
I noticed that too. But the disk image bug wasn't included in this
update, was it?
> Funny how Apple decided to go patch the 1 year old Perl_sv_vcatpvfn bug
> now, after Kevin pointed it out on the list the other day.
>
> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15629
I noticed that too. But the disk image bug wasn't included in this
update, was it?
[ reply ]