On 29 Nov 2006, at 19:18, stephen joseph butler wrote:
> 2006/11/29, veto (at) forked (dot) dk [email concealed] <veto (at) forked (dot) dk [email concealed]>:
>> Funny how Apple decided to go patch the 1 year old
>> Perl_sv_vcatpvfn bug
>> now, after Kevin pointed it out on the list the other day.
>>
>> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15629
>
> I noticed that too. But the disk image bug wasn't included in this
> update, was it?
You mean you credit Apple for being able to fix the bug, test it, and
including it into the update or that they had the fix in place since
a year and were *forced* to released it because of a post in this
mailing list?
I also noticed it stopped raining outside after Kevin pointed out the
1 year old bug on the list the other day.
> 2006/11/29, veto (at) forked (dot) dk [email concealed] <veto (at) forked (dot) dk [email concealed]>:
>> Funny how Apple decided to go patch the 1 year old
>> Perl_sv_vcatpvfn bug
>> now, after Kevin pointed it out on the list the other day.
>>
>> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15629
>
> I noticed that too. But the disk image bug wasn't included in this
> update, was it?
You mean you credit Apple for being able to fix the bug, test it, and
including it into the update or that they had the fix in place since
a year and were *forced* to released it because of a post in this
mailing list?
I also noticed it stopped raining outside after Kevin pointed out the
1 year old bug on the list the other day.
[ reply ]