Den 30/11/2006 kl. 16.29 skrev fwa266m (at) mac (dot) com [email concealed]:

> On 29 Nov 2006, at 19:18, stephen joseph butler wrote:
>
>> 2006/11/29, veto (at) forked (dot) dk [email concealed] <veto (at) forked (dot) dk [email concealed]>:
>>> Funny how Apple decided to go patch the 1 year old
>>> Perl_sv_vcatpvfn bug
>>> now, after Kevin pointed it out on the list the other day.
>>>
>>> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15629
>>
>> I noticed that too. But the disk image bug wasn't included in this
>> update, was it?
>
> You mean you credit Apple for being able to fix the bug, test it,
> and including it into the update or that they had the fix in place
> since a year and were *forced* to released it because of a post in
> this mailing list?
>
> I also noticed it stopped raining outside after Kevin pointed out
> the 1 year old bug on the list the other day.
>

The point was that apple could have fixed it a year ago. And now
suddenly did after kevin pointed it out to the public.

[ reply ]