|
Focus on Apple
ClamXav for OS X 10.4 Aug 10 2007 02:43PM Pfost William B (William Pfost ci irs gov) (4 replies) RE: ClamXav for OS X 10.4 Aug 10 2007 09:28PM Todd Woodward (todd_woodward symantec com) (2 replies) Re: ClamXav for OS X 10.4 Aug 11 2007 02:33AM Edward R Marczak (marczak radiotope com) (2 replies) RE: ClamXav for OS X 10.4 Aug 13 2007 09:51PM Todd Woodward (todd_woodward symantec com) (1 replies) RE: ClamXav for OS X 10.4 Aug 14 2007 10:09AM David Harley (david a harley gmail com) (1 replies) Re: ClamXav for OS X 10.4 Aug 10 2007 07:24PM Rob DeWitt (diggertadmin gmail com) (1 replies) RE: ClamXav for OS X 10.4 Aug 10 2007 08:53PM David Harley (david a harley gmail com) (2 replies) RE: ClamXav for OS X 10.4 Aug 10 2007 09:17PM William Holmberg (wholmberg amdpi com) (1 replies) RE: ClamXav for OS X 10.4 Aug 11 2007 11:41AM David Harley (david a harley gmail com) (1 replies) RE: ClamXav for OS X 10.4 Aug 14 2007 07:43PM William Holmberg (wholmberg amdpi com) (1 replies) Re: ClamXav for OS X 10.4 Aug 14 2007 09:16PM Dave Mangot (dmangot terracottatech com) (1 replies) RE: ClamXav for OS X 10.4 Aug 14 2007 09:41PM William Holmberg (wholmberg amdpi com) (1 replies) RE: ClamXav for OS X 10.4 Aug 10 2007 09:10PM Dixon, Wayne (wcdixo aurora lib il us) (2 replies) Re: ClamXav for OS X 10.4 Aug 11 2007 10:16AM Radoslav Dejanoviæ (radoslav dejanovic opsus hr) (1 replies) Re: ClamXav for OS X 10.4 Aug 10 2007 06:50PM Roland Dobbins (rdobbins cisco com) (1 replies) RE: ClamXav for OS X 10.4 Aug 10 2007 07:35PM Pfost William B (William Pfost ci irs gov) (1 replies) Re: ClamXav for OS X 10.4 Aug 10 2007 08:09PM Rob DeWitt (diggertadmin gmail com) (2 replies) Re: ClamXav for OS X 10.4 Aug 10 2007 09:22PM Kevin Finisterre \(lists\) (kf_lists digitalmunition com) (1 replies) |
|
Privacy Statement |
> I'm not sure I'd call it *significant*, but, Mac users can certainly
> pass files on to Windows users that are infected.
This is, in fact, the main reason that antivirus software for Linux
exists. It is used mainly (but not excluseively) to scan for Windows
viruses.
The reason is quite simple - as Linux is still viewed by many as
exclusively server OS, something that will route your e-mail or store
your files on a network share, the data that is kept there or routed
trough is used primarily on Windows machines; therefore, an e-mail virus
scanner or a disk scanner that could scan Samba shares for files
infected with viruses that can't hurt Linux but can hurt Windows clients
isn't such a bad idea.
Another point is that Mac user can receive and send a file infected with
Windows virus without ever realizing that something isn't right. Not
that you should care if some Windows user send you infected document,
but you should take steps to ensure that it isn't you who is spreading
it further.
[ reply ]