Focus on Apple
Apple to Allow Virtualization of Leopard? Oct 31 2007 08:53PM
Todd Woodward (todd_woodward symantec com) (1 replies)
Re: Apple to Allow Virtualization of Leopard? Oct 31 2007 09:08PM
Dave Schroeder (das doit wisc edu) (1 replies)
For what it's worth, virtualization is exactly why this language was
added...no, it doesn't use the word, but that's why this is there, and
over time we'll see Apple confirming that to the liking of, I think,
everyone.

- Dave

On Oct 31, 2007, at 3:53 PM, Todd Woodward
<todd_woodward (at) symantec (dot) com [email concealed]> wrote:

> Although not specifically security related, virtualization is quite
> a bit in security testing and research...
>
> The following article for your consideration and discussion:
>
> Apple to Allow Virtualization of Leopard
> By Adam C. Engst
> http://db.tidbits.com/article/9277
>
>
> My only comment is that this is NOT the same as Apple coming right
> out and saying in plain English "you can run Mac OS X within a
> virtual machine on Apple-branded-hardware-host under the following
> specific conditions, pursuant to the EULA...". As far as I know,
> Apple themselves have never directly and publicly addressed running
> Mac OS X within a virtual machine. (Speaking through Parallels and
> VMware doesn't count, IMHO.)
>
>
> Security Response Researcher
> Focus-Apple Moderator
>
> ________________________________________
> Todd D. Woodward
> Technical Support Engineer
> NetBackup Support
> Symantec Corporation
> www.symantec.com
> Springfield, Oregon
> ________________________________________
> Office: 541-335-7441
> ________________________________________
>
>

[ reply ]
RE: Apple to Allow Virtualization of Leopard? Oct 31 2007 10:48PM
Todd Woodward (todd_woodward symantec com) (1 replies)
RE: Apple to Allow Virtualization of Leopard? Nov 01 2007 01:33PM
Don Rhodes (drhodes mail colgate edu)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus