|
Incidents
Real-world attacks on sendmail CA-2003-07 seen Mar 07 2003 05:37PM Bennett Todd (bet rahul net) (2 replies) Re: Real-world attacks on sendmail CA-2003-07 seen Mar 08 2003 03:31AM jlewis lewis org (1 replies) Re: Real-world attacks on sendmail CA-2003-07 seen Mar 10 2003 06:52PM Bennett Todd (bet rahul net) (1 replies) Re: Real-world attacks on sendmail CA-2003-07 seen Mar 10 2003 08:56PM Juan Gallego (Little Boss physics mcgill ca) (1 replies) Re: Real-world attacks on sendmail CA-2003-07 seen Mar 08 2003 12:57AM Mike Tancsa (mike sentex net) (2 replies) Re: Real-world attacks on sendmail CA-2003-07 seen Mar 10 2003 06:40PM Jeff Kell (jeff-kell utc edu) Re: Real-world attacks on sendmail CA-2003-07 seen Mar 09 2003 02:41PM Bennett Todd (bet rahul net) (1 replies) |
|
|
Privacy Statement |
> i have to agree. althought i don't have the original messages, i happen to
> log email subjects, and they have spam written all over them.
Hrm.
Worth noting, perhaps, that the intelligent cracker (as opposed to
the script kiddie) will craft port 25 exploits specifically *to*
look like spam in your logs...
If you have to ask if you're being paranoid enough, you're not.
Source addresses are pretty much meaningless in this case. If it's
an open relay, it's just as good for the exploit as it is for spam.
Whoops.
Cheers...
--
gabriel rosenkoetter
gr (at) eclipsed (dot) net [email concealed]
[ reply ]