|
Incidents
Massive SPAM Increase Oct 06 2006 11:02PM Alex (incidents alex gotdns org) (2 replies) Re: Massive SPAM Increase Oct 08 2006 09:30PM Kurt Seifried (bt seifried org) (1 replies) Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 01:15AM Vini Engel (vini fugspbr org) (1 replies) Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 04:06AM Kurt Seifried (bt seifried org) (1 replies) Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 05:06AM Vini Engel (vini fugspbr org) (1 replies) Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 06:33PM Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (3 replies) Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 14 2006 02:46AM Valdis Kletnieks vt edu (1 replies) Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 14 2006 03:52AM Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (3 replies) Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 17 2006 01:20AM Jamie Riden (jamesr europe com) Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 16 2006 05:04PM benfell raven cybernude org (2 replies) Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 16 2006 05:38PM Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (1 replies) Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 17 2006 01:44AM gabriel rosenkoetter (gr eclipsed net) Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 14 2006 05:44AM Valdis Kletnieks vt edu (1 replies) Re: ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 14 2006 05:17PM Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (2 replies) Re: ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 17 2006 01:59AM Dude VanWinkle (dudevanwinkle gmail com) Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 11:09PM Graeme Fowler (G E Fowler lboro ac uk) (1 replies) Re: Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 11:43PM Luke Burton (luke burton echidna id au) (1 replies) Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 09:29PM Tim (tim-forensics sentinelchicken org) (2 replies) Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 10:33PM Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (2 replies) Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 10:47PM Nathaniel Hall (nathaniel d hall gmail com) |
|
Privacy Statement |
On Oct 9, 2006, at 15:29, Tim wrote:
>> Its purpose is to reject *all* mail from bogus MTAs - dialups,
>> misconifigured servers, MTAs that aren't registered in the
>> domains' DNS as
>> a "legal" MX, MTAs that don't reverse properly, etc., etc. If the
>> email is
>> forged in any way, it will never make it to DATA.
>
> That's great, except it makes the internet more expensive for the
> little
> guy. If you're trying to run a non-spamming personal mailserver
> off of
> a consumer DSL or cable line, you can get screwed by others' policies
> like this because you may not have control over your PTR records or
> how
> your ISP lists you as a non-MTA with other organizations.
Some university campuses maintain strict control over their reverse
DNS entries, and so departments or on-campus organizations, research
institutes, etc. that run their own mail servers will have non-
matching forward and reverse DNS entries on their MX hosts. Blocking
rules like this make life difficult for them as well.
Cases such as these raise the question, if the blocked mail never
gets into your network, how would you know about the rate of false-
positives?
Brent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
This List Sponsored by: Black Hat
Attend the Black Hat Briefings & Training USA, July 29-August 3 in Las Vegas.
World renowned security experts reveal tomorrow's threats today. Free of
vendor pitches, the Briefings are designed to be pragmatic regardless of your
security environment. Featuring 36 hands-on training courses and 10 conference
tracks, networking opportunities with over 2,500 delegates from 40+ nations.
http://www.blackhat.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
[ reply ]