Incidents
Massive SPAM Increase Oct 06 2006 11:02PM
Alex (incidents alex gotdns org) (2 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase Oct 09 2006 05:01AM
jim barchuk (jb jbarchuk com) (1 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase Oct 09 2006 11:00PM
Graeme Fowler (G E Fowler lboro ac uk)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase Oct 08 2006 09:30PM
Kurt Seifried (bt seifried org) (1 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 01:15AM
Vini Engel (vini fugspbr org) (1 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 04:06AM
Kurt Seifried (bt seifried org) (1 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 05:06AM
Vini Engel (vini fugspbr org) (1 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 06:33PM
Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (3 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 14 2006 02:46AM
Valdis Kletnieks vt edu (1 replies)
Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 14 2006 03:52AM
Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (3 replies)
--On October 13, 2006 10:46:34 PM -0400 Valdis.Kletnieks (at) vt (dot) edu [email concealed] wrote:

> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 13:33:12 CDT, Paul Schmehl said:
>
> (Digging out from a long week of other stuff, sorry for the late
> response)
>
>> Its purpose is to reject *all* mail from bogus MTAs - dialups,
>> misconifigured servers, MTAs that aren't registered in the domains' DNS
>> as a "legal" MX, MTAs that don't reverse properly, etc., etc. If the
>> email is
>
> "mta that aren't registered in the DNS as a "legal" MX" - tell me Paul,
> how does that work with any site that's big enough that they run split
> inbound MX and outbound servers?
>
Send me an email at geek (at) stovebolt (dot) com [email concealed], and I'll tell you.

I'm not sure what you mean by "split inbound and outbound", but any
outbound MX host *should* be listed in DNS. You only list one -
smtp.vt.edu. 192.82.162.213 is reversible, so it would get points for
being honest about its IP/hostname, but it would lose points for not being
listed in DNS as an MX. The overall score would determine if the mail was
rejected, but I doubt that it would be.

Easy enough to tell. Send me mail.

Paul Schmehl (pauls (at) utdallas (dot) edu [email concealed])
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
0?ñ *?H?÷
 ?â0?Þ1 0 +0  *?H?÷
 ? Þ0?÷0?` =ÏóD¦4°k>-@N_zS0
 *?H?÷
0ê1'0%U
The University of Texas System10U VeriSign Trust Network1;09U 2Terms of use at https://www.verisign.com/rpa (c)991200U )Class 2 CA - OnSite Individual Subscriber1-0+U$The University of Texas at Dallas CA0
060830000000Z
070830235959Z0ô1'0%U
The University of Texas System1-0+U $The University of Texas at Dallas CA1F0DU =www.verisign.com/repository/CPS Incorp. by Ref.,LIAB.LTD(c)9910U Mail Stop - UTD10U Paul Schmehl1!0 *?H?÷
 pauls (at) utdallas (dot) edu0 [email concealed]?"0
 *?H?÷
?0?
??\õ"&Y%¥ÊKe?E?$ÚÑ
,`?SÈ@roÞ?¶*qªp|!ZÛï*Õ¿UG'æ¿AIºDÅén©ýj?:K-?·Õõ!§uE?×BØh'{
Ó
¸¾õÓÓNðÂ?¼qS ¨Ã??UNkQ]¾öU??ÏòêYÚ"óÖå«bÙ×âüä/?jµÛ??µwd7ÄöõSÆ$¬còxýäå©??r;û|5
7³®÷é®4búÊå8À¿«8?¸}K6ÑØÒ?4p ìï?ø8ϳ?mHàðÑ?Çäüë5!£hÖ·9?)léú7£? 0?0 U00U0pauls (at) utdallas (dot) edu0 [email concealed]?$U ?0?0? `?H?øE0?0++https://www.verisign.com/rpa-
kr0Ò+0ÅÂNOTICE: Private key may be recovered by VeriSign's customer who may be able to decrypt messages you send to certificate holder. Use is subject to terms at https://www.verisign.com/rpa-kr (c)99.0 `?H?øB?0uUn0l0j h f?dhttp://onsitecrl.verisign.com/TheUnive
rsityofTexasSystemTheUniversityofTexasatDallasCA/LatestCRL.crl0 U
?0U%0++0
 *?H?÷
iË?ØáÀ¥Ëv½s??ärbµác9X5©!Áu?ºÏk0áìß%ªÛx7-?ÖaáaÙyb6Ïë?RKJà¡z
¡,íÊ?Þ÷~7?Ï?{µà¯º]yå3DÖ?\Ç 3g
n7BªÛ.Ì"çÈ+YO{áRÆF%øc¸ï¼ð0?Ø0?A Aì=§?ÄöÕ ÝÑe0
 *?H?÷
0Á1 0 UUS10U
VeriSign, Inc.1<0:U 3Class 2 Public Primary Certification Authority - G21:08U 1(c) 1998 VeriSign, Inc. - For authorized use only10U VeriSign Trust Network0
990331000000Z
090330235959Z0ê1'0%U
The University of Texas System10U VeriSign Trust Network1;09U 2Terms of use at https://www.verisign.com/rpa (c)991200U )Class 2 CA - OnSite Individual Subscriber1-0+U$The University of Texas at Dallas CA0?0
 *?H?÷
0?¿êï?ë
Áù"ÁÑÁÌÛzÚ¾6Òp`0`åàS/5ôɨ)ÖÞ=ó?d}¾Ñ?Tx?ÿ¢xñû?«Ãü?LÂIA
áÀÒ¥×ü~ÿBQNtóÕhs¥]1øæ)%c¨#?Dj?°9ñïÛFXú¸ÏKózÁ¢I??#Cº?2?£¥0¢0
)U"0 ¤010UPrivateLabel1-1400 `?H?øB0DU =0;09 `?H?øE0*0(+https://www.verisign.com/RPA0U
0ÿ0 U0
 *?H?÷
S µÜ²¶?Ñ P?É8yÜȲI¿¸S?o?̲äz|ü£è_a^_??ZÒ?"ñ¼íñT¶T¦T¡T¼iÇ!7¢?9?§¬ ?è?]?
H9Y?$ C¼??Ü?táæã¾j¤?11#%?¯º,Q?Y¦£?Ò´ÎT0?0?l¹/`Ì??¡zF ¸[pl?¯0
 *?H?÷
0Á1 0 UUS10U
VeriSign, Inc.1<0:U 3Class 2 Public Primary Certification Authority - G21:08U 1(c) 1998 VeriSign, Inc. - For authorized use only10U VeriSign Trust Network0
980518000000Z
280801235959Z0Á1 0 UUS10U
VeriSign, Inc.1<0:U 3Class 2 Public Primary Certification Authority - G21:08U 1(c) 1998 VeriSign, Inc. - For authorized use only10U VeriSign Trust Network0?0
 *?H?÷
0?§?!t,çð?á?<!ñ?Û?é?ü¾_RÈÌ,V,¸i,Ì?­°?®yò9Á{?º
,èÂ?,ªié ôÇ©¤BÂ#OJØð¢û1lÉæo?'õæôLx?mëF?ú¹?ÉTò²Ä¯ÔFZÉ0ÿ
lõ-mÎw0
 *?H?÷
r.ùÑñqûÄ?öÅ^Q?@?¸hø??Øâ½ÿí¡æfê/ ôÊ×ê¥+?ö$`?MD.?¥Ä- Ó®xiorÚl®ðc?7æ»Ä0­wÌI5ªÏ؏Ѿ·?GsjT"4d-¶?Y[´QY:³ 
ôßg ô­2d^±Fr'?{ÅD´®1?Û0?×0ÿ0ê1'0%U
The University of Texas System10U VeriSign Trust Network1;09U 2Terms of use at https://www.verisign.com/rpa (c)991200U )Class 2 CA - OnSite Individual Subscriber1-0+U$The University of Texas at Dallas CA=ÏóD¦4°k>-@N_zS0 + ±0 *?H?÷
 1  *?H?÷
0 *?H?÷
 1
061014035212Z0# *?H?÷
 1Ùßsù,ª?Í?7|!´1vò0R *?H?÷
 1E0C0
*?H?÷
0*?H?÷
?0
*?H?÷
@0+0
*?H?÷
(0
 *?H?÷
?+?û­µàÁpëZ§_CðÕ?B%ØàzOuo|¢d¢?ª¼ÅÞ??;R?Õ|?=F?ãaʁ&_qÛÈZ
ÒÛ?Ý*ÝNMRZø¸iHéá?(¯#yåýý?Â:¥0¡?É?MÌIºØ;¬Qà?Í?Ô¨LVÞvÓ?c?ïPHJªÒzl¢Å
^Ç|Ò?;.[tg[
«RH?Í&U)¸o`äd0?ÂZÑQøYÝ83Ù»à#Ñ?+
xcH?J©Ét??|?üÒóå£ãkøÞQ?{Y*ø&µ@ Â?Êz÷ÈZ¶ûXsÐÜ2?xh>_ î£WK9?þ×

[ reply ]
Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 17 2006 01:20AM
Jamie Riden (jamesr europe com)
Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 16 2006 05:04PM
benfell raven cybernude org (2 replies)
Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 16 2006 05:38PM
Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (1 replies)
Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 17 2006 01:44AM
gabriel rosenkoetter (gr eclipsed net)
Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 16 2006 05:29PM
Valdis Kletnieks vt edu
Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 14 2006 05:44AM
Valdis Kletnieks vt edu (1 replies)
Re: ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 14 2006 05:17PM
Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (2 replies)
Re: ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 17 2006 01:59AM
Dude VanWinkle (dudevanwinkle gmail com)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase Oct 16 2006 03:57PM
gabriel rosenkoetter (gr eclipsed net) (1 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase Oct 17 2006 01:33AM
Jamie Riden (jamesr europe com)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 11:09PM
Graeme Fowler (G E Fowler lboro ac uk) (1 replies)
Re: Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 11:43PM
Luke Burton (luke burton echidna id au) (1 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase Oct 10 2006 07:44PM
Tillmann Werner (tillmann werner gmx de)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 09:29PM
Tim (tim-forensics sentinelchicken org) (2 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 10:33PM
Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (2 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 11:48PM
Tim (tim-forensics sentinelchicken org)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 10:47PM
Nathaniel Hall (nathaniel d hall gmail com)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 10:28PM
Brent Kearney (brent kearneys ca) (1 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 10:38PM
Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus