|
|
Incidents
Massive SPAM Increase Oct 06 2006 11:02PM Alex (incidents alex gotdns org) (2 replies) Re: Massive SPAM Increase Oct 08 2006 09:30PM Kurt Seifried (bt seifried org) (1 replies) Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 01:15AM Vini Engel (vini fugspbr org) (1 replies) Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 04:06AM Kurt Seifried (bt seifried org) (1 replies) Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 05:06AM Vini Engel (vini fugspbr org) (1 replies) Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 06:33PM Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (3 replies) Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 14 2006 02:46AM Valdis Kletnieks vt edu (1 replies) Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 14 2006 03:52AM Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (3 replies) Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 17 2006 01:20AM Jamie Riden (jamesr europe com) Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 16 2006 05:04PM benfell raven cybernude org (2 replies) Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 16 2006 05:38PM Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (1 replies) Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 17 2006 01:44AM gabriel rosenkoetter (gr eclipsed net) Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 11:09PM Graeme Fowler (G E Fowler lboro ac uk) (1 replies) Re: Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 11:43PM Luke Burton (luke burton echidna id au) (1 replies) Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 09:29PM Tim (tim-forensics sentinelchicken org) (2 replies) Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 10:33PM Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (2 replies) Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 10:47PM Nathaniel Hall (nathaniel d hall gmail com) Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 10:28PM Brent Kearney (brent kearneys ca) (1 replies) |
|
Privacy Statement |
> I'm not sure what you mean by "split inbound and outbound", but any
> outbound MX host *should* be listed in DNS.
Tell you what. Explain what an *OUTBOUND* MX is, and I'll see what I can do.
The machine in question is *NOT* listed as an MX, because it is *NOT* a
machine that should be accepting *inbound* mail for the domain. Its purpose
in life is to send mail to off-campus sites.
But then, utdallas.edu can't pass that check either - I'm checking back
through the various mail you've sent, and I found this header:
Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by lists
.grok.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA6DD608 for <full-disclosure (at) lists (dot) grok [email concealed]
.org.uk>; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:54:20 +0100 (BST)
However, the DNS says:
utdallas.edu. 46676 IN MX 10 mx2.utdallas.edu.
utdallas.edu. 46676 IN MX 20 mx0.utdallas.edu.
mx2.utdallas.edu. 76415 IN A 129.110.10.17
mx0.utdallas.edu. 46676 IN A 129.110.10.17
At least SPF, for all it's busticatedness, understood that at many sites,
the MX is *not* the outbound box (and in fact, the asymmetric configuration
is why you need an SPF record rather than testing the MX values...)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFFMHkkcC3lWbTT17ARAuorAJsGvJ24WPnh3E68PRFrGUqQTe2NfACgtHDV
7pHIns5uxLP20G0e0iTugHI=
=OEHE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[ reply ]