Incidents
Massive SPAM Increase Oct 06 2006 11:02PM
Alex (incidents alex gotdns org) (2 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase Oct 09 2006 05:01AM
jim barchuk (jb jbarchuk com) (1 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase Oct 09 2006 11:00PM
Graeme Fowler (G E Fowler lboro ac uk)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase Oct 08 2006 09:30PM
Kurt Seifried (bt seifried org) (1 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 01:15AM
Vini Engel (vini fugspbr org) (1 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 04:06AM
Kurt Seifried (bt seifried org) (1 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 05:06AM
Vini Engel (vini fugspbr org) (1 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 06:33PM
Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (3 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 14 2006 02:46AM
Valdis Kletnieks vt edu (1 replies)
Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 14 2006 03:52AM
Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (3 replies)
Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 17 2006 01:20AM
Jamie Riden (jamesr europe com)
Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 16 2006 05:04PM
benfell raven cybernude org (2 replies)
Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 16 2006 05:38PM
Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (1 replies)
--On Monday, October 16, 2006 10:04:30 -0700 benfell (at) raven.cybernude (dot) org [email concealed]
wrote:
>
> Wrong. Completely wrong. Any UNIX-like box with qmail can be configured
> to send mail out. My laptop, for example. But my domains only receive
> mail at the servers designated as MX hosts in DNS.
>
> Your idea that an outbound mail host should be listed in DNS indicates a
> complete misunderstanding of the purpose of an MX record. These records
> indicate to other MTAs where they should deliver mail *to*, not where they
> should accept mail from.

{{{sigh}}} It sure would be nice if you guys would READ before jumping all
over this. Of course the MX record indicates where you send mail *to*.
But historically thoses hosts were also the ones that accepted mail. And
in fact, *many* domains still handle it that way. Yes, some do not,
including ours, but that's beside the point.

Furthermore, policyd-*****WEIGHT***** (get it?????) assigns *weights* to
various "flaws" (much like spamassassin does to content) and it takes a lot
more than one flaw to reject the mail.

If you think that's wrong now, take it up with the author of
policyd-weight, not me. And as I have stated **repeatedly**, if you don't
believe me, send a test message to geek (at) stovebolt (dot) com [email concealed] and see if it gets
through. To my knowledge, not one person who has done that has had their
mail rejected.

Paul Schmehl (pauls (at) utdallas (dot) edu [email concealed])
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
0?ñ *?H?÷
 ?â0?Þ1 0 +0  *?H?÷
 ? Þ0?÷0?` ú½?Íá^Á±ÀØÌ?þ0
 *?H?÷
0ê1'0%U
The University of Texas System10U VeriSign Trust Network1;09U 2Terms of use at https://www.verisign.com/rpa (c)991200U )Class 2 CA - OnSite Individual Subscriber1-0+U$The University of Texas at Dallas CA0
060831000000Z
070831235959Z0ô1'0%U
The University of Texas System1-0+U $The University of Texas at Dallas CA1F0DU =www.verisign.com/repository/CPS Incorp. by Ref.,LIAB.LTD(c)9910U Mail Stop - UTD10U Paul Schmehl1!0 *?H?÷
 pauls (at) utdallas (dot) edu0 [email concealed]?"0
 *?H?÷
?0?
?Ów?|?9î±\<?R??$]Êa,ÌZ??h¾b""ØÉ???5w
õ&&²#?=é°?¦t
b¨hg6ÆØÁ<SWõúI?×UP+ ÓøhjËeDéû?¿f¹HÕMôèN4ÆÙE?Uc?l«p ~? N)r/á&bxÐÞn=Âë?U?K½H°ßIÂ-m*_¼_?/ÐÞ?¸aÛÜý!Ç?>?ø?YCs?vÎ?6#EËÛÐå
?Ó:­?Þ?lØ?)?G?Æ3?éæD}LÏüßÛ+?É`Ê?û¡k??Y®4§y¸zϐ?â\úºýë?£? 0?0 U00U0pauls (at) utdallas (dot) edu0 [email concealed]?$U ?0?0? `?H?øE0?0++https://www.verisign.com/rpa-
kr0Ò+0ÅÂNOTICE: Private key may be recovered by VeriSign's customer who may be able to decrypt messages you send to certificate holder. Use is subject to terms at https://www.verisign.com/rpa-kr (c)99.0 `?H?øB?0uUn0l0j h f?dhttp://onsitecrl.verisign.com/TheUnive
rsityofTexasSystemTheUniversityofTexasatDallasCA/LatestCRL.crl0 U
?0U%0++0
 *?H?÷
{yÙtÿà1aæ?GÄ MÍ]û÷¬MÕª?=ÀÒTPÍ´±Æà76e¾¥
¦^BäEß]_Úïjn@màïD¨ê?Ý%Ë¥ü`8í@ZñI¢?Bn °:ê­½?åA¦vSÙË^ºZA>É?t0îF?æOjÈ?¿Í¹°Q+mÓ0?Ø0?A Aì=§?ÄöÕ ÝÑe0
 *?H?÷
0Á1 0 UUS10U
VeriSign, Inc.1<0:U 3Class 2 Public Primary Certification Authority - G21:08U 1(c) 1998 VeriSign, Inc. - For authorized use only10U VeriSign Trust Network0
990331000000Z
090330235959Z0ê1'0%U
The University of Texas System10U VeriSign Trust Network1;09U 2Terms of use at https://www.verisign.com/rpa (c)991200U )Class 2 CA - OnSite Individual Subscriber1-0+U$The University of Texas at Dallas CA0?0
 *?H?÷
0?¿êï?ë
Áù"ÁÑÁÌÛzÚ¾6Òp`0`åàS/5ôɨ)ÖÞ=ó?d}¾Ñ?Tx?ÿ¢xñû?«Ãü?LÂIA
áÀÒ¥×ü~ÿBQNtóÕhs¥]1øæ)%c¨#?Dj?°9ñïÛFXú¸ÏKózÁ¢I??#Cº?2?£¥0¢0
)U"0 ¤010UPrivateLabel1-1400 `?H?øB0DU =0;09 `?H?øE0*0(+https://www.verisign.com/RPA0U
0ÿ0 U0
 *?H?÷
S µÜ²¶?Ñ P?É8yÜȲI¿¸S?o?̲äz|ü£è_a^_??ZÒ?"ñ¼íñT¶T¦T¡T¼iÇ!7¢?9?§¬ ?è?]?
H9Y?$ C¼??Ü?táæã¾j¤?11#%?¯º,Q?Y¦£?Ò´ÎT0?0?l¹/`Ì??¡zF ¸[pl?¯0
 *?H?÷
0Á1 0 UUS10U
VeriSign, Inc.1<0:U 3Class 2 Public Primary Certification Authority - G21:08U 1(c) 1998 VeriSign, Inc. - For authorized use only10U VeriSign Trust Network0
980518000000Z
280801235959Z0Á1 0 UUS10U
VeriSign, Inc.1<0:U 3Class 2 Public Primary Certification Authority - G21:08U 1(c) 1998 VeriSign, Inc. - For authorized use only10U VeriSign Trust Network0?0
 *?H?÷
0?§?!t,çð?á?<!ñ?Û?é?ü¾_RÈÌ,V,¸i,Ì?­°?®yò9Á{?º
,èÂ?,ªié ôÇ©¤BÂ#OJØð¢û1lÉæo?'õæôLx?mëF?ú¹?ÉTò²Ä¯ÔFZÉ0ÿ
lõ-mÎw0
 *?H?÷
r.ùÑñqûÄ?öÅ^Q?@?¸hø??Ø❽ÿí¡æfê/ ôÊ×ê¥+?ö$`?MD.?¥Ä- Ó®xiorÚl®ðc?7æ»Ä0­wÌI5ªÏ؏Ѿ·?GsjT"4d-¶?Y[´QY:³ 
ôßg ô­2d^±Fr'?{ÅD´®1?Û0?×0ÿ0ê1'0%U
The University of Texas System10U VeriSign Trust Network1;09U 2Terms of use at https://www.verisign.com/rpa (c)991200U )Class 2 CA - OnSite Individual Subscriber1-0+U$The University of Texas at Dallas CAú½?Íá^Á±ÀØÌ?þ0 + ±0 *?H?÷
 1  *?H?÷
0 *?H?÷
 1
061016173808Z0# *?H?÷
 1?Iç?1?çý&):·òé-ü ?²0R *?H?÷
 1E0C0
*?H?÷
0*?H?÷
?0
*?H?÷
@0+0
*?H?÷
(0
 *?H?÷
?z¦wÐçP¢CÉ?÷
?)?.??5ÁVGF*å?ô ?mÝÆL&Å*â,¯ Á?LÑ\??ê?|bÔ´üT!t´äÊúÌÝ%ª®?PBh?Ùí9
%©rÛ¦´X»×??;í¢>a7ç?Ï?eg'Aø·69Zñ4?-5Ä1Õw²v`LúÝHÚŧézÀUOû^?ò=
?Áâ~Õ¼Û%9Hí<lZ¼?Ñý¸29ñ£à!S??iME?§·n¸:¢â w?dèô¼?B·%äÑ}dZW?QYkqÕ/1?Pð֍k²lÝÃãÊN[BÝÙ

[ reply ]
Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 17 2006 01:44AM
gabriel rosenkoetter (gr eclipsed net)
Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 16 2006 05:29PM
Valdis Kletnieks vt edu
Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 14 2006 05:44AM
Valdis Kletnieks vt edu (1 replies)
Re: ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 14 2006 05:17PM
Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (2 replies)
Re: ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 17 2006 01:59AM
Dude VanWinkle (dudevanwinkle gmail com)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase Oct 16 2006 03:57PM
gabriel rosenkoetter (gr eclipsed net) (1 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase Oct 17 2006 01:33AM
Jamie Riden (jamesr europe com)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 11:09PM
Graeme Fowler (G E Fowler lboro ac uk) (1 replies)
Re: Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 11:43PM
Luke Burton (luke burton echidna id au) (1 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase Oct 10 2006 07:44PM
Tillmann Werner (tillmann werner gmx de)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 09:29PM
Tim (tim-forensics sentinelchicken org) (2 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 10:33PM
Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (2 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 11:48PM
Tim (tim-forensics sentinelchicken org)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 10:47PM
Nathaniel Hall (nathaniel d hall gmail com)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 10:28PM
Brent Kearney (brent kearneys ca) (1 replies)
Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6} Oct 09 2006 10:38PM
Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus