|
|
Vuln Dev
Bash Blues. Feb 13 2003 02:26PM uk2sec oakey no-ip com (5 replies) Re: Bash Blues. Feb 13 2003 05:34PM Roland Postle (mail blazde co uk) (1 replies) glibc glob_filename() recurse call stack overflow (Re[2]: Bash Blues) Feb 15 2003 06:54AM 3APA3A (3APA3A SECURITY NNOV RU) (1 replies) Re: glibc glob_filename() recurse call stack overflow (Re[2]: Bash Blues) Feb 15 2003 09:30PM Vladamir Shmirnov (red_vigil yahoo com) (2 replies) Re: glibc glob_filename() recurse call stack overflow (Re[2]: Bash Blues) Feb 16 2003 10:19AM spacewalker (spacewalker altern org) Re: glibc glob_filename() recurse call stack overflow (Re[2]: Bash Blues) Feb 16 2003 01:54AM Roland Postle (mail blazde co uk) |
|
Privacy Statement |
the stack (it segfaults on my Debian 3.0 on a push %edi in malloc()). I
don't know how exploitable this is at all.
-----Original Message-----
From: admin (at) badger.sytes (dot) net [email concealed] [mailto:admin (at) badger.sytes (dot) net [email concealed]]
Sent: Saturday, 15 February 2003 11:49 AM
To: vuln-dev (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
Subject: A different bash blues
In relation to the Bash Blues thread, I have something that may be of
interest.
eval `perl -e 'print ":;" x 97500'`
This causes bash to crash too sig 11. I don't know if this means
anything
or not, but who knows, it may be useful to someone else. The number
97500
is most likely a lot higher that it needs to be but I have noticed that
when I have tried this on different machines, it takes slightly
different
amounts of :; to get it to crash.
[ reply ]