my bad. I was working from this link:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=FH;[LN];sp&
which (is supposed to) show all the latest SPs for various products. I
guess Microsoft hasn't gotten around to updating this page yet (or the
underlying office page that it references
(http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q276367))
At 08:58 AM 11/20/2002 -0800, David Vincent wrote:
>microsoft released Office 2000 SP3 last week...
>
>http://office.microsoft.com/downloads/2000/o2ksp3.aspx
>
>includes the outlook 2000 sr-1 email security update as well as all other
>updates to this point (as far as i can tell - i created an admin install
>point, updated with sp3 and installed to a fresh install of w2k then visited
>the office update site - nothing to do!)
>
>i've updated 20 machines with this one, with no issues reported yet.
>
>-d
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Eric [mailto:ews (at) tellurian (dot) net [email concealed]]
>Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 2:19 PM
>To: auto472736 (at) hushmail (dot) com [email concealed]; focus-ms (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
>Subject: Re: outlook 2000 vs latest outlook express deployment
>
>
>as long as you've applied the latest Office 2000 Service Pack (SP2
>http://office.microsoft.com/downloads/2000/SP2upd.aspx) you will be in
>decent shape. Office 2000 SP2 includes the Outlook Email Security Update
>(OESU)
>
>If you don't have Office 2000 SP2, but you do have Office SR-1a, you can
>download the Outlook email security update separately. More info on
>Security and Outlook and the OESU here:
>http://www.microsoft.com/office/outlook/evaluation/security.asp
>
>FAQ is here:
>http://office.microsoft.com/assistance/2000/Out2ksecFAQ.aspx
>
>the actual OESU is here:
>http://office.microsoft.com/Downloads/2000/Out2ksec.aspx
>
>the KB article about the update is here:
>http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q235309&id=KB;E
N-US;
>Q235309
>
>the OESU is also included in Office 2002.
>
>
>Outlook Express is an entirely different product, built by a different team
>(nuff said). You should use Outlook, and not OE, if possible.
>
>
>
>At 09:01 PM 11/17/2002 -0800, auto472736 (at) hushmail (dot) com [email concealed] wrote:
>
> >All,
> >
> >Our school have been using eudora for many years. Due to political
> >reasons, we now have to migrate to outlook. We have licensed copies of
> >Outlook 2000 which provides the tasks, calendar, etc. functions
> >and the latest free version of Outlook Express. In terms of security,
> >which version is more secure? We do not have a budget for Outlook 2002
> >However, we have enough paid Outlook 2000 licenses to more than accomadate
> >everyone at this point. I am just concerned with the security issues. We
> >already have an antivirus solution at the mail gateway and also NAV on the
> >user desktops.
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=FH;[LN];sp&
which (is supposed to) show all the latest SPs for various products. I
guess Microsoft hasn't gotten around to updating this page yet (or the
underlying office page that it references
(http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q276367))
At 08:58 AM 11/20/2002 -0800, David Vincent wrote:
>microsoft released Office 2000 SP3 last week...
>
>http://office.microsoft.com/downloads/2000/o2ksp3.aspx
>
>includes the outlook 2000 sr-1 email security update as well as all other
>updates to this point (as far as i can tell - i created an admin install
>point, updated with sp3 and installed to a fresh install of w2k then visited
>the office update site - nothing to do!)
>
>i've updated 20 machines with this one, with no issues reported yet.
>
>-d
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Eric [mailto:ews (at) tellurian (dot) net [email concealed]]
>Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 2:19 PM
>To: auto472736 (at) hushmail (dot) com [email concealed]; focus-ms (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
>Subject: Re: outlook 2000 vs latest outlook express deployment
>
>
>as long as you've applied the latest Office 2000 Service Pack (SP2
>http://office.microsoft.com/downloads/2000/SP2upd.aspx) you will be in
>decent shape. Office 2000 SP2 includes the Outlook Email Security Update
>(OESU)
>
>If you don't have Office 2000 SP2, but you do have Office SR-1a, you can
>download the Outlook email security update separately. More info on
>Security and Outlook and the OESU here:
>http://www.microsoft.com/office/outlook/evaluation/security.asp
>
>FAQ is here:
>http://office.microsoft.com/assistance/2000/Out2ksecFAQ.aspx
>
>the actual OESU is here:
>http://office.microsoft.com/Downloads/2000/Out2ksec.aspx
>
>the KB article about the update is here:
>http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q235309&id=KB;E
N-US;
>Q235309
>
>the OESU is also included in Office 2002.
>
>
>Outlook Express is an entirely different product, built by a different team
>(nuff said). You should use Outlook, and not OE, if possible.
>
>
>
>At 09:01 PM 11/17/2002 -0800, auto472736 (at) hushmail (dot) com [email concealed] wrote:
>
> >All,
> >
> >Our school have been using eudora for many years. Due to political
> >reasons, we now have to migrate to outlook. We have licensed copies of
> >Outlook 2000 which provides the tasks, calendar, etc. functions
> >and the latest free version of Outlook Express. In terms of security,
> >which version is more secure? We do not have a budget for Outlook 2002
> >However, we have enough paid Outlook 2000 licenses to more than accomadate
> >everyone at this point. I am just concerned with the security issues. We
> >already have an antivirus solution at the mail gateway and also NAV on the
> >user desktops.
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com
[ reply ]