Focus on Microsoft
L0phtCrack and Windows 2000 LM Hashes Feb 06 2003 07:26PM
Chris Mawer (red_hantu hotmail com) (3 replies)
Re: L0phtCrack and Windows 2000 LM Hashes Feb 07 2003 07:22AM
Anders Thulin (Anders Thulin kiconsulting se)
RE: L0phtCrack and Windows 2000 LM Hashes Feb 07 2003 04:32AM
dave (dave netmedic net)
Re: L0phtCrack and Windows 2000 LM Hashes Feb 06 2003 11:12PM
Pez Mohr (boredMDer74 msn com)
Chris Mawer wrote:
> 2. Should I report my findings to @Stake, in the belief LC has a flaw?

I really doubt that they would care, what with that being an obselete
version. @Stake has since released LC4, which, IMO, is faster and more
reliable than LC3. You should update to LC4 before complaining to @Stake. If
the problem still exists, however, then I would consider reporting it (if it
is even a problem worth reporting).

Pez Mohr
boredMDer74 (at) msn (dot) com [email concealed]
PGP Key: http://tinyurl.com/3rmk
Fingerprint: 35F0 4088 BCA3 457C FDE4 3ABC 4E02 1AD7 9EBE 09FE

[ reply ]


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus